California Governor under pressure on Bell to ban PFAS cooking tools | Gavin New No.
Gavin Newsom, California Governor, faces intense pressure from the industry, and even some celebrity chefs, as it weighs whether it will sign an invoice prohibiting the cooking tools made of PFAs or “chemicals forever”.
The legislation, which was approved by the California Legislative Council on September 12 Think about He nominated for a democratic presidential nomination, which increased his decision.
Public health defenders say the pressure of industry is part of a broader attack aimed at a similar ban on PFAs in cooking tools in other states. Newsom has a history veto Some environmental bills around them Toxic chemicalsIncluding a ban on PFAS in home detergents and artificial grass made amid pressure in the same industry. But defenders say they worked with the administration to address fears.
“The industry offers a lot of pressure on the newsom, and they do this in the press, and they fear people and adults of age write to him saying that the sky will decrease,” said Andrea Ventura, the legislative director of clean water procedures, who pressed the bills. “We are not sure where it will fall on this.”
The newsom office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Until October 13 he has the right to veto the bill.
PFAS is a category of about 16,000 chemicals used frequently to make water -resistant products, spots and lips. Vehicles have been linked to cancer, birth defects, low immunity, high cholesterol in cholesterol, kidney disease and a set of other serious health problems. They are called “chemicals forever” because they do not collapse naturally in the environment.
The alliance of cooking tools, a commercial group founded by two of the largest manufacturers of cooking tools in the world, Groupe Seb and Meyer, leads this charge against the embargo. Steve Burns, a group pressure groups, said it is particularly concerned about restaurants that use PFAS around the kitchen.
“Some of the elders in the nation depend on the lack of disk,” he said. “They need this in their restaurants.”
Burns claimed the butter and oil used in the pans more unhealthy than exposure to PTFE and said that the cooking tools industry was unfairly disgusted because it did not create chemicals.
“Two steps have been removed, but we are the ones who take responsibility,” Burns said.
Among the chefs who came out in the opposition of the draft law are Thomas Keeler, David Zhang and Rachel Ray – Each had a cooking tool lines that could take a financial blow from the ban. That was drawn cash From the actor and anti -PFAS Mark Rovalo, who supports the ban.
The state legislative council is the seventh in which a ban on the sale of PFAs is passed in cooking tools, which is part of the package that prohibits the use of chemicals in six categories of products. The legislative bodies of the state across the United States have suggested hundreds of borders to use PFAs in consumer goods in recent years, which pressure companies to move away from dangerous chemicals often in unnecessary uses.
“These are uses that can be avoided for PFAs that we can eliminate now,” said Avi Car, the first manager of the toxins program at the Council for the Defense of Natural Resources, which is pressing to support the draft law. “PFAS is a big problem and we need to do everything we can to reduce exposure. This is a clear cut, and there are alternatives, so it will not cause hardship.”
Defenders say they worked with industry in other products categories, but only cooking tools were hostile to legislation. The industry was previously filed in the Federal Court in an attempt to cancel a similar ban in Minnesota, but the lawsuit Rejected.
After promoting the newsletter
Similar tactics and demands are published in California. The industry said, without providing fixed evidence, that the ban has caused a lack of cooking tools on store shelves. Defenders say Maine was among the first states to prohibit PFAs in the cooking tools, and the industry has claimed that brides in the state are upset because they could not get Teflon’s articles in their records.
PFAS compounds such as PTFE, which are also called TEFLON, are used most used in the pans, and the industry has claimed that the chemical is safe and should not be classified as PFAs. The New Mexico gave PTFE to ban their cooking tools, but most governments classify them as PFAS and organize them. While science suggests that PTFE poses a less healthy threat from other most dangerous PFAs, some research that the peers has reviewed highlights the risks throughout its life cycle.
High toxic PFAS is used to manufacture PTFE, and the previous one can end in the environment or residue on a frying pan. When the PTFE cooking devices are scratched or cut Incurred Micro- or nanoparticles in the food. His search linked PTFE in conjunction with other fine plastic to reduce sperm quality, among other health issues, and PTFE fumes It emanates from all It can cause influenza -like symptoms.
Ventura noted that the California Trade Group for Water and Sanitation supports the ban because the facilities left the cost of trying to remove PFAs from drinking water.
The industry also runs ads in California, claiming that the state is in a cost -cost living crisis, and the banning of families will compel more than $ 300 to buy new utensils and arches. In one of the ads that ran on Instagram, a woman stands in the kitchen states that she cannot buy a new article.
But Ventura noticed that the embargo only covers the sale of new cooking tools with PFAs and it will not prohibit the possession or purchase of products outside the state. Although the alternatives to industrial claims are more expensive, most companies also make stainless steel products, cast iron or non -adhesive ceramic products, many of which are the same price.
“All you have to do is walk in Marshall or Messi and you can see that it is at the same price, and companies make alternatives,” said Ventura. “No one will go to your home or your restaurant kitchen and take away [the Teflon pans]”