The Guardian View on Star Wars II: The US Missile Shield plans Nuclear instability | Editorial

WLast week, Donald Trump ordered a stroke from his pen, an “iron dome for America” ​​- an act that risks the destabilizing global armament race. Mr. Trump’s proposal is his name from the Israeli air defense system, but it is filmed in more ambitious phrases for the United States: a space objection system designed to counter nuclear missile threats and hyperactivity.

It is also the latest jungle of the wheel in a course of escalation. Washington’s movements have ended to “increased security” over and over again, making the world more volatile and unsafe. The historical opportunity to eliminate nuclear weapons in 1986 Ronald Reagan’s insistence on the “Star Wars” missile defense system in America’s insistence on America. In 2002, George W. Bush-citing the threat from North Korea-was disposed of a ballistic missile treaty, which was built on the idea that mutual weakness cools the nuclear armament race while the defenses that have not been determined. In the new nuclear era, Ankit Panda notes that Russia and China have responded to anti -guarantees to ensure “their nuclear forces will get the ability to penetrate an advanced American regime.”

The result of these policies was that Russia and China could provide devastating nuclear attacks that the United States does not have a real hope of defense, while North Korea has a continent ballistic ballistic missile that can hit the mainland of the United States. Likewise, madness repeats the same procedure and expects a different result. However, Mr. Trump calls the second stars war. Given the technological obstacles and the high costs that involve them, the possibilities are that it is vision It will never be achieved. However, the rhetorical effect is likely to be intimidating other countries in building more nuclear weapons.

Mr. Trump’s executive order is also a shift in US policy. Instead of missile defense, which focuses on “rogue states” like North Korea and Iran, they are re -focused on Russia and China. Its area is that the new system will be so strong that it will reduce the temptation of enemies to attack in the first place. Whether it lacks the point you risk in the uncontrolled arms race.

in January 2022, a month before Russia invaded Ukraine, the five recognized nuclear forces confirmed that “taboos” confirmed that the use of nuclear weapons is morally unacceptable. But its continuous strategic value shows that nuclear weapons were not truly stigmatized – because if they are, no one will discuss them as useful military tools. In fact, the dangerous speech of the master TrumpRussia Vladimir Putin And even India Narindra Moody It indicates a disturbing normalization of nuclear exchange.

This is particularly concerned when the United States and the Soviet Union are chasing the Cold War in the end, “Farm in this Great Nuclear Competition consisting of three players” between Washington, Moscow and Beijing, as Mr. Panda writes. The use of a small part of the nuclear trilogy will lead to an unprecedented comprehensive destruction. Unless there is a major shift, the last Treaty of US Weapons Control Russia, new beginningWhich limits strategic nuclear warheads and restricts the numbers of a missile launcher, will end in 2026. Chinese and Russian officials must sit together and rebuild nuclear stability. The survival of the world is on the revival of the opponent’s cooperation. True security comes from Weapons control Creative nuclear diplomacy and diplomacy, do not try to build an irreplaceable shield.