The International Energy Agency Group suits the White House after removing government spending tracking Trump administration
On Monday, the Row Committee group filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration regarding its decision to remove a general follower of how the government is spent on the money allocated by Congress.
The Director of the Administration and Budget Office (OMB), Russell Vogue, sought to justify the follower of the follower, and told Congress in March that the tool “requires detection of sensitive information, race and trading.”
He added: “Such disclosure has a chilling effect on the trading within the executive branch.”
But the lawsuit, which was filed on behalf of the non -profit group, protects democracy in the US District Court in Washington, DC, that federal law requires OMB to publish distribution documents publicly.
“Congress has imposed a quick transparency to divide to prevent power violations and enhance the supervision of Congress and the public for the spending,” The lawsuit says. “In the absence of this transparency, the president and an ambiper may misuse their authority because of the clarification of federal funds without public audit or in Congress.”
The government accounting office, a monitoring of Congress, also stabbed the logical basis of Vogue earlier in April, According to the federal reserve.
“Since statues are legally binding decisions regarding agencies under the counter -deficiency law, we note that this information, by definition, cannot be prior or in advance,” The agency wrote In a message to vickt. “This is very disturbing due to the possible effects of reviewing such records of federal reviews, censorship in Congress, specifically with regard to the authority of the Congress of the portfolio.”
A democratic lawsuit for protection from the court must announce that the OMB decision to remove the follower was illegal and the agency’s demand to restore it.
The Democrats in Congress also sparked a warning about the removal of the follower.
After promoting the newsletter
“The Congress is the requirements of these requirements for the Democratic President’s objections on the basis of the two parties because our voters, and all American taxpayers, deserve transparency and accountability on how to spend their money,” He said in a joint statement In March. “The landing of this site is not only illegal – it is a rude step to hide the spending of this administration from the American people and from Congress.”
The site was activated after the legislation was passed during the presidency of Joe Biden.
Citizens of responsibility and morals in Washington Lay a similar suit Earlier in April, a request to restore the follower.