Amending the appearance of shares on the guide fees; Shedding light responds
UNION University has increased the British actors with their public battle with signs of casting such as Spotlight by supporting an amendment to Parliament, which he says will prevent them from imposing fees presented to those looking for work.
On Tuesday, April 29, the House of Lords will start discussing amendments to the draft employment law, one of which says Equity that will prevent casting signs such as Spotlight- and other employment platforms for creativity-from imposing membership fees provided to job seekers. This specified adjustment is likely to be heard within two weeks.
“This is an important step towards ending the tax on hope for the performance and creators who have long faced unfair financial barriers in front of the search for work. If it succeeds, this amendment will pave the way for the end of the fees provided for evidence and creative employment platforms for good,” said Paul Fleming, Secretary -General Paul Fleming.
With the support of a specialized employment lawyer, the amendment will be placed by Earl Klantari Nicholas Ternch, an artist and writer who works for his own account sitting in the House of Lords. The amendment specifically relates to the arts and entertainment sectors in performance and invitations to “cancel the rights of employment agencies to impose fees on employers to include information about them in the post.”
When presenting the equity plan, Spotlight, which was distinguished by fairness and also facing legal action from the Federation, firmly firmly to the idea that she is acting incorrectly and indicated that she was invited to discuss the amendment with Clancistry and others.
“The spotlight is not an employment agency, and our subscriptions are not a fee – just like stock dues,” said Matt Hood, CEO of Spotlight. “The lights are sure that the Supreme Court will reach this conclusion in the coming months.”
Hood added: “We are working with their peers and deputies throughout the political parties, ministers and civil service employees in multiple departments, about a variety of topics that will have a real impact on performance artists in the United Kingdom and the broader industry, including the rights of artists, artificial intelligence, luxury and opportunities for the child, work in the European Union, and protecting employees for their representatives.”
The draft employment rights law is currently on its way through the board of directors of the House of Lords, and it is one of the leading legislation in the government of the Labor Party, and deals with areas such as working hours, independent work rights and the economy, all of which are related to the film and television industry in some way.
The stocks were in war while highlighting the membership fees for several months. The Federation launched legal measures against the well -known evidence of “exploiting its monopolistic location in the industry” in early last year, and the deadline understands that this procedure will be heard in the UK Supreme Court in July. We were told that the amendment differs from the legal procedure.
Equity says that the practice of imposing fees on membership is illegal in some sectors, but not movies and television. Although the UK law allows the likes of Spotlight to impose fees on membership, it states that the subscription fees should be “no more than reasonable estimate of the cost of production.” According to stocks last year, Spotlight had 90,000 members and was getting an income of more than 1.25 million pounds ($ 1.66 million) per month. “It is unreasonable for this number to represent a reasonable estimate of the costs of producing and trading guide,” said Equity last year.
Spotlight previously pledged to combat the legal procedure with the description of Equity claims last year as “deceptive and inaccurate in reality.”