The highest fashion enemy faces an internal crisis, as Trump is pushing to redraw the maps
The country’s most prominent constellation organization in the midst of an internal discussion is tense about whether its position, which opposes all the re -division of party circles, is a wonderful development in response to the fashion war that erupted throughout the country.
It is a sign that after two decades of progress made by the part against partisan clouds, the movement faces an existential crisis.
He fought the common issue of limestone exchange through laws, referendums and constitutional amendments for decades, while fighting both Democrats and Republicans in the red and blue states to adopt measures to curb legislators from drawing boycott lines that benefit from their party.
Why did we write this
A common issue has argued for decades against the re -division of party circles as bad for democracy. The group is now facing internal pressure to relax on its position in California, amid fears that democracy is facing greater challenges.
But on Monday night, after a meeting by the National Board of Directors of the organization, the group’s president and CEO of Virginia sent the organization’s leaders of the organization via e -mail, who are asking them not to make any new statements about GerryMandering until the Board of Directors issued more directive, which it said would come later this week. The request for decline is at a time when Democrats in California pressure the suspension of the independent division committee in the state temporarily to allow them to draw five or more of the areas generated from democracy. This step-which would retract the anti-patent reforms that helped the joint issue in the law in 2010-is a response to paying Republicans in the middle of the decade to redraw the state maps in Texas and other places in their favor before the mid-period elections 2026.
While IRCS [independent redistricting commissions] Our gold standard remains and will continue to be our position, the Board of Directors is currently studying options on how to respond under these very unusual conditions. ”Mrs. Solomon wrote in an email to the group’s leaders who read on the screen by two separate sources they received.
“It is definitely a turning point for our organization,” said one of the employees participating in the screen.
Internal tensions in the common cause are an amazing sign of times, as voting rights and pro -democracy groups are struggling with how to respond to what many of them see as an unprecedented attempt to undermine and even dismantle democracy by President Donald Trump and his Republican allies. While Republicans are fighting to maintain the majority of their high home and unrestricted control of the federal government, each seat can accuse-the largest two countries can easily raise the balance of power with partisan clouds.
President Trump, who said on Monday that the Republican Party was “entitled to five other seats” in Texas, prompted the state’s Republicans to redraw the map of Congress.
Democrats in Texas fled their mandate to prevent voting on the bill. On Tuesday, the governor of the state of Texas Greg Abbott asked the state’s Supreme Court to remove the leader of the Democratic minority from his post, as other Republicans called on the legislators. California Governor Gavin New Roosom and his democratic allies responded by pledging to restore charity if she continued Texas, as she pushed a state level at the state level to temporarily suspend the map of California and called on the Democrats to return the maps to the fluctuations of the largest number of seats to their column.
History of fighting for democratic reforms
COMMON CAUSE played a non -partisan organization, a major role in many government reform battles for half a century, from the batch to reducing the age of national vote to 18 to the struggle to reform the financing of national campaigns.
The group is particularly famous for its anti-anger efforts-all of the successes and relapses. She played a major role in adopting the 2010 Citizen Division Committee in California, where she worked closely with Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to strengthen a referendum at the state level that canceled one of the most players in the country. After that, California moved from a state that had no competitive house races to one that was at the center of the battle in order to control the house.
The joint case also filed a lawsuit against Gerrymander in North Carolina, a case that eventually went to the US Supreme Court (Rucho V. Common Cause). In the rule of a teacher 2019, the court was divided 5-4 along the partisan lines, declaring that although gerrymandering may be “incompatible with democratic principles”, federal courts cannot displace-a major setback for anti-importance efforts.
The position of the common issue, which is unambiguous, has remained in the consolidated weeks even in recent weeks.
Less than two weeks ago, the joint case made a press invitation with the state leaders from California and Texas entitled “Why Newsom and Trump are wrong in re -dividing the circles.” Organization A national petition was launched “Every ruler – democratic and Republican – must publicly commit to rejecting any efforts and efforts to redraw the maps to achieve party gains.”
But this position has long been under review by the council.
“This is the first time in the modern history that the President of the United States and his one -sided political party moves to the result engineer in the elections before one vote. It led to a wave of responses throughout the country and will have long -term long consequences for our democracy.”
“We evaluate all options on the table to counter this attack on our democracy. We still confirm that the re -dividing the independent circles that the citizen leads are the golden standard to protect people’s strength.”
When asked if this means that the organization’s board of directors was discussing the opposition or staying neutral in the horizon battle that waved on the horizon in California, or whether it might go to the point of supporting the plan to get rid of temporary Democrats, Mrs. Solomon released that the group “evaluating all options on the table to counter this attack on our democracy.”
“You can’t disarm unilaterally”
Voting rights, democracy-reform, and good government groups themselves have found increasingly transformed with Democrats in recent years. But not everywhere. Democrats continued to draw players in states such as Illinois and Maryland, which have no clear restrictions on the withdrawal of the party line, generating tensions with these groups. The common reason was ready to confront Democrats and criticize them at the guarantee. (Rucho v
Many Democrats have adopted in recent years the maps of re -dividing the non -party circles as a good government message and a sound political strategy aimed at retracting large republican maps. But since President Trump asked Texas to re -draw its map before the upcoming elections to try to help the Republican Party to maintain control of the home, there was a major shift in the democratic approach. Several rulers of blue countries, led by California Governor New Roire, threatened to respond to satisfaction, although many of their states have laws prohibiting players.
Since the Democrats have quickly turned into saying that they cannot waive the battle, they put voting rights organizations in an increasingly difficult position.
Representative Ted Liu, a Democrat in California and a member of the Democratic Leadership in the House of Representatives, told the screen in late July that he was urging good government groups to support the push of Democrats in California for a group of their wings to fight against Geremandand in Texas.
“I hope they now realize that you cannot disarm unilaterally,” he said. “You now have the possibility of no democracy, which means that there is no good government. So I hope they realize their presence in the face of existential threats.”
One sources close to the joint issue says that there is “great pressure” of democratic positions to obtain the organization “to retract our support for the re -division of independent circles” in California.
It is still unclear what the group will take. The failure of the Board of Directors to reach a consensus in a meeting on Monday indicates the dispute between the members.
Some still oppose
Not everyone reconsidates their position on gerrymandering.
The joint case worked closely with the then governor, Schwarzenegger, to prohibit legislation in the state in 2008 and the fashion Congress two years later.
Daniel Ketchil, Chief of Staff of the Schwarzenegger, notes that the former ruler has continued a campaign to combat horoscopes in recent years, including in 2018 in Colorado and Michigan-and says his outlook has not changed.
“He believes that Al -Liri’s conflicts are evil, regardless of who does this and carried a campaign against it throughout the country. [that] He says, “There are two mistakes that do not make the truth.”
Activists say the multiple common issue they are personalized personally on the issue. They spent their career to fight partisan gerrymanders and see them bad for democracy. They are also worried that any support for the temporary exemption of their position will permanently undermine their credibility.
But many see that the middle of the period is a decisive turning point in the survival of democracy. They see the Democrats point that preventing infiltration into the blue states, while the red countries in Al -Jirian continue without restrictions only will represent the map to the right, ignore the will of the voters, and enable President Trump to undermine democracy.
“What does a kind of support for democracy mean when all other columns fall?” One source close to the common cause asks the letter. “Is there a kind of moral or reliable way to bend the rules? I don’t know.”