The work must be exposed to the legends of Farraj immigrants Immigration and asylum

You can see how it works. First, the issue against asylum seekers depends on affecting public services and residence costs. Then we have signs to “fight men at age”. Then we have Nigel Faraj, they explicitly say that asylum seekers pose a threat to our “women and girls” and national security. It is a short step from there to “vigilance” that is encouraged to harass anyone colored in the vicinity of a refugee detention camp. Then distinguishes the distinction between asylum seekers and immigrants. This is the way to the dangerous racist conflict. Look only to the example of Northern Ireland, where ordinary legal immigrants were expelled from some areas by right -wing thugs.

What is the response of the government of the Labor Party? Exposing UK myths increasingly from asylum seekers and migrants? Only. Instead, they call non -practical or unprecedented plans. Besides this moral cheese, it is very stupid when private government responses to the situation show every sign of not working.
Simon Rio
London

Democrats said the same about Donald Trump (attacked Faraj due to the “ugly” speech of the collective deportation plan for asylum seekers, August 26). He won because he led the narration. Likewise, Nigel Faraj’s popularity will win racism unless the Labor Party is pushing a strong residence to dispel the idea of ​​threat. The voters, who convinced him of Farraj, will not respond to his opponents.

People need facts loudly and clearly, in simple phrases. The truth of those who are really immigrants, the various reasons behind their arrival, and the small percentage that comes in boats and the broad economic and social contributions of immigrants to this country for decades, which is part of the fabric of our society. In addition to our long -term commitment to a refuge for people in need.

Nothing is the denial of the complexities of modern immigration. But if our government is not seen respect and promotes the truth of immigrants, we are in a deep trouble. We just have to look across the Atlantic Ocean to see the reason.
Paula Jones
London

Rafael Behr (there is a clear way to challenge the Nigel Farage. But Keir Starmer will not do it, August 27) has a right to decipher Nigel Faraj in the whistle of immigration dogs, but one needs to take into account the factors that explain the reason for his continued traction. At a time when the Refugee Conference, 1951 was signed, the world’s population was 2.54 billion. It is now about 8.2 billion. Thus, the potential volume of expatriates for refugees is much greater than it was when the rights of refugees were first adopted. This is at a time when the UK cannot give the child’s support to families who have more than two children, he has NHS astronomical lists and a reasonable lack of housing.

All of this waving the wet very well welcomes all arrivals, but there are legitimate concerns about a larger problem of size than they were ever. This government has realized this fact, but it is jointly struggling with all other Western governments, to find a solution and clarify it.
Raj Barkash
London

Raphael Bear expresses the famous frustration of many to the point that the Labor Party refuses to call for the foolishness of the sentence represented in leaving the European Union as the most British accusation of British policy, government and administration for decades, and put the blame firmly where he belongs-on sales of demagogical snake oil on fire international.

The cancer that has been extracted since the referendum is the rise of bilateral policy, in which one can only win by losing others-and thanks to the most performed cruelty to punish those who consider the enemy.

There is now a national crisis. It is not a matter of desirable people in boats. It is about Britain to become a hell that is currently uniform in the United States. Politics revolves around the options. If the progressive parties do not gather, then what is still a majority in the country looking at the future managed by the failed pottery with contempt and disgust, then we are increasingly arranged to imitate a country that is no longer many of the British people, including me, are thinking of the visit.
Kevin Lloyd
Hype, London

Nigel Farage and a small number of repair deputies, at most, justify a few inches of columns on the inner pages of the guardian. Unfortunately, with the finest intentions, you and the rest of the media continue to make Farage in a tall national political figure. This is what happened with Donald Trump in America, and to some extent, with Boris Johnson. to caution! The luxurious and comprehensive promotion of people enables Nigel Farraj a real and worthy leader.
Dr. Ian Flintov
Oxford

A spokesman for the Downing Street refused to exclude negotiations with the Taliban on returning refugees. We can be sure that all of these refugees will be killed by the Taliban and that any guarantees on the contrary that they may give them will not deserve a bucket of cold spitting.

This statement, after Nigel Faraj’s performance to choose a barrel on Tuesday, is the lowest new level and completely sadness for this country. Care Starmer, within a little more than a year, I pulled the party to the ethical sewers. After 52 years, I lost my vote.
Robert McNulati
Manchester