Amnesty International will use the Federal Workers’ responses, who have been asked to justify their jobs via email
Washington-It is expected that the responses to the email directed to Elon Musk will be fed to government employees about the work they accomplished last week.
The sources said that the information will go to LLM (a large language model), an advanced AI system that looks at huge amounts of text data to understand, create and process the human language. The artificial intelligence system will determine whether a person’s work is free or not.
American emails to manage employees were sent to federal workers on Saturday, shortly after Musk books in X that “all federal employees will soon receive an email calling for an understanding of what was done last week. The failure of the response will be considered resignation.”
The OPM email did not mention the resignation threat, but he said: “Please respond to this email with approximately. 59 pm EST.
The sources said that the reason behind the email request did not request any links or attachments due to the plan to send information to the artificial intelligence system.
The request from OPM has not been answered about whether humans will participate in reviewing the responses immediately. The White House refused to comment.
Follow the coverage of the living policy here
After the deadline of the employees to respond to the email, it has passed late on Monday, OPM did not immediately respond to the request for comment regarding the number of workers who answered and the number of required to do so.
In an email to the workforce earlier on Monday, the Ministry of Justice said that during a meeting with the Council of Human Capital officials between the head of agencies, OPM had reported that employees’ responses to email were voluntary. OPM also made it clear that despite what Musk published, the lack of response to the email is not equal to the resignation, the email said.
Musk complained about the violent reaction to his guidance Social media platform Late Monday.
“The email request was completely trivial, as the criterion for passing the test was to write some words and click on sending! However, many have failed even in this test, which was urged in some cases by its managers. Have you seen such inconuse and contempt how it is done Spending your tax?
In a later tweet, it seemed that a second email could be sent to government workers who are not responding to the first.
“Taking into account the appreciation authority of the president, they will be given another opportunity. Failure to respond for the second time will lead to end,” books.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request to comment on the post.
The initial guidance has faced a retrieval of unions, workers and even some agencies since its sending, but President Donald Trump was praised earlier in the past.
“I thought it was great,” Trump told reporters at the Oval Office.
We have people who do not appear to work and no one knows even if they are working in the government, so by asking the question, “Tell us what I did this week,” what he does says does it actually work. Then he said: “If you do not respond, for example, You are in the form of an superior or shoot, “claiming without providing evidence that” many people do not answer because they are not present. “
“There was a lot of genius in sending it,” Trump said. “If people do not respond, it is very likely that there is no such person or they are not working.”
The coalition of unions and groups that were fighting the Trump’s collective workers from the test workers, this effort was illegal. They amended a lawsuit against the employee management office in the United States during the weekend to add a claim that involves an OPM email that directs workers to justify their work week.
the suit Accusations that the administration did not follow the appropriate procedures for such an order and the judge must be mobilized.
“The collective shootings that OPM ordered illegal and the trust of countless federal employees. The request for federal workers who are still in the job must justify themselves by a number of five achievements adds only an insult to the injury. This is also against the law, Lawyer Nurim Eisen said in a statement on behalf of the plaintiffs.
Trump Musk has been assigned to reduce the size of the government, and e -mail is seen as part of its payment to reduce the federal workforce by up to 10 %.
Some agencies, including those led by Trump’s close allies, have requested its employees to ignore the guidance.
The Ministry of Justice employees were informed earlier on Monday that they did not need to respond to the message, according to the emails that NBC News saw. “Due to the secret and sensitive nature of the administration’s work, the Ministry of Justice employees do not need to respond to the email from OPM. If you have already responded to this email, there will be no other procedure,” Read an email sent sent by one of the assistants from the administration’s assistant. Julien Ann Louor.
The FBI director, Cash Pateel, instructed employees during the weekend to “stop any responses” to the email, and said that his agency will make a review of its own. Employees The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, National Health Institutes, the Ministry of Defense, the National Security Agency and the National Intelligence Director Office were also informed of not responding to the email.
The Ministry of Agriculture has also sent an uncompromising email to employees to inform them that any response to the email is “voluntary and not required.”
Email was also sent to an unknown amount of judicial branch employees, including judges and court employees. Spokesman for federal courts in Manhattan and the northern region of Illinois NBC news confirmed that “some” people had obtained the message.
Jolly Hoodik, a spokeswoman for the northern province in Illinois, also confirmed the e -mail and said that the chief judge and writer in the court “communicate with employees that we are judicial employees, our policies and procedures are governed by the United States’ judicial conference and local human resources booklets.”
A spokesman for the southern region in New York said that the individuals there had been directed not to respond to the email.
On Monday, managers of the Environmental Protection Agency sent typical responses to employees to the email to facilitate the matter.
“As sympathy for their employees, they sent examples,” said one of the agency’s employees, who shared two managers’s responses with NBC News. The employee NBC requested not to publish the entire responses of managers for fear of revenge.
Officials in the Department of Health and Humanitarian Services, Medicare and Medicaid services directed the employees to respond by the deadline. HHS informed the employees of the OPM directions that were changed later on Monday, and warned that the information they choose to share “may” read “malicious foreign actors.”
Send an email sent to the Ministry of Transport employees and obtained by NBC News to the response to the OPM mail on the weekend requesting five bullet points from their work. The letter also asked the employees to exclude any secret information from their responses. Transport Minister Sean Duffy Adopt the challenge Himself in a post on social media.
Musk seems to follow the same playing book that he used when he bought Twitter, which was called X.
Musk started his period of work there by laying down the massive workers, and asking the employees to adhere to the “very hardline” work in an email entitled “Thorn on the Road” or shooting. Email theme line is the same as the e -mail that was sent to federal employees by the employee management office who offer purchases in January. It took about 75,000 federal employees.
Then the Twitter employees were asked to print the code pages they wrote from last month and prepare to present the work to Musk personally. According to the code reviews, and instead, the managers were asked to classify their employees, according to what they mentioned. freedom.
Musk and DOGE access to government data and information have become a basic friction point between the group and its critics. In at least 11 lawsuits, prosecutors have argued that Dog had faded laws and rules about data and privacy. Some lawsuits indicated allegations that Dog is using artificial intelligence to analyze and process government data. the Washington Post mentioned In February, Dog used artificial intelligence to analyze spending in the Ministry of Education, citing two people familiar with the project.
Parliament Speaker Mike Johnson described, R. La.
“Elon broke the code. It is now inside the agencies. He created these algorithms that are constantly crawling through the data. As he told me in his office, the data is not lying. We will be able to get this information. Washington.
The Senator Lisa Morakovsky, RA Alaska had some harsh words of the way Dog were working, and called the email sent to federal workers to serve and broadcast them.
“I think a few people and dignity in the process are what many Federal Alaska employees demand, and I do not think this requires a lot.”
Dog’s work has led to criticisms and cases of workers that must be re -renewed after removing them from the basic jobs. On Monday, two people are aware of this issue that the administration returns some employees in the Department of Medical Devices in the Food and Drug Administration after dozens of dozens of DOGE initiative were discharged to reduce costs.
The medical devices department are responsible for agreeing to the safety of a group of products, from X -ray machines to surgical transplants. The workers were demobilized earlier this month, and included doctors and cyber security experts.
Some of these employees received phone calls or email messages during the weekend to inform them that they were canceled. The number of employees who have been offered to their jobs, or the number of will eventually return.
The administration had a similar problem this month with the nuclear safety employees who were left.
On Friday, a federal judge in New York issued a preliminary judicial order prohibiting the arrival of Duji to the regulations of the sensitive treasury after a coalition from the states provided evidence that its employees had not followed the appropriate safety protocols.
in Harsh ruleThe American boycott judge, Janet Vargas, criticized the “chaotic and random approach” of Wuj, and found that the coalition “has proven that there is a realistic danger that secret financial information will be revealed in the absence of granting of restraint relief.”