An accurate approach to aging, sex and sex sex

Born in 1976, I am at the same age as Susanna Rosten and the generation of “middle -aged women, and sexual nationalities” who believe that their biological race should support their rights and define their rights (why is there such a gap between generations in views of sex and sex in Britain?, June 5). I am not one of these people. He made me experience to live in a female body in a distorted world of class, layer, economic and ethnic-do not mind environmental destruction-just wondering why some people are important.

The progressive society must really tend to see a person first, whether beyond or in the deep recognition of his politicized identities. One can see both biological sex and non -material at the same time. As 50 approaches, it is clear to me that it is possible to hold these two ideas simultaneously. My femininity of my menopause is important because it hinders the things I want to do in life. But there is no important way for me above all, and there is no chance on the road to a greater degree of different effects of social and economic inequality.

It is a fallacy indicating that the cross -crossing is more compatible with capitalism than group liberation. If the PROGRESS PRIDE flag is transferred from the corporate building – a rare scene in my experience compared to the science of rainbow pride – not because it “suits them”, in the words of Rusten, to turn attention away from the class policy towards individual expression. Perhaps younger youth understand that the interests of companies do not deal with class policy anyway, so how will science hurt anyone?

I was born with the breasts and ovaries, and I still have it; I was born twice. These facts had an undeniable effect on my life – but also a defect of my category from his birth and the ongoing advantage of my home. If I have to look at every aspect of my life through the perspective of the reproductive organs, I will limit the possibilities of looking at the multiple effects of all these factors in general – the effects that can only lead to the conclusion that they are human, a person, first. It is called the intersection, and this term was reached by Kimberly Crincho, who was born in 1959.
Forget Hanley
Liverpool

Susanna Rosin tells many possibilities because Gen Z is more likely to defend the inclusion of sexually transformed women into individual spaces. One thing you did not mention is that it might be due to personal relationships that this demographic is likely to be with sexually transformed individuals, and the ease of sympathy for the conflicts we know.

As an older member of the Gen Z, I had publicly converted peers in the regiment during my presence at the university, and my former neighbor was transgender, and now in a practical place, I have a sexually converted colleague. This is similar to the standard – the trustee article from June 2022 indicates that 50 % of the British Gen Zers said they knew at least one person of transgender people. I would like to claim that General Z is struggling more explicitly to include and protecting sexually transformed women because we are more likely to see them as real women, rather than “self -identification”, because of our personal prayers with them. For me, my transit colleague parasitizes my physical privacy with the same amount that my colleague in the Association of Independent Countries has seen.

As always, I ask others to search for the voices and stories of transgender people if their knowledge is out of your demographic, so that we can sympathize better with this rapprochement group often.
Mads Barker
Camelford, Cornwall

Thank you for such a well -written article and clearly argued by Susanna Rustin. I am pleased to see the Guardian publishing this article. It is very important to be able to speak frankly about these important issues and engage in an explicit but respectful discussion. I fully agree with the author and also add that with the age of experience, fatigue, more accurate expectations of life and a profound understanding of how to embody our experiences, but anger also-anger that the rights of women who are obtained hard-working can be easily rejected by what calls for what calls for women’s rights.
The name and address presented