Anxiety in Downing Street about the Shaghus Islands deal Shaghus Islands
The work sources told the Guardian newspaper that the personalities of the Downing Street Street have concerns about the government’s deal to give up sovereignty on the Shaghus Islands.
The ministers suffer from fire due to an agreement to control the islands, including Diego Garcia, which includes a joint air base between the United States of America, to Mauritius. Under the conditions of the deal, the base will remain under the control of the UK on a 99 -year lease contract.
Kerr Starmer told the deputies on Wednesday that the deal was necessary for the Diego Garcia base to continue the work. “Without legal certainty, the base cannot work in practical phrases as it should,” Prime Minister told MPS. “This is bad for our national security and it is a gift for our opponents.”
But senior sources said that some at Downing Street had reservations about the deal, which cost large political capital and risked the relations with the Donald Trump administration.
Marco Rubio, Foreign Minister Trump, criticized the agreement before his appointment and his first invitation with David Lami, UK Foreign Minister, earlier this month.
Jonathan Powell, who negotiated the agreement before his appointment as a national security advisor in the United Kingdom, is scheduled to travel to Washington, DC, to meet his American counterpart, Mike Walz, this week, amid fears that the Trump administration can seek to cancel the deal.
The government was criticized by opposition deputies. Ed Davi, the liberal democratic leader, accused the ministers of “failed” negotiations and asked why they “made great payments to Mauritius, at a time when fuel payments were canceled in the winter.”
Kimi Badnouch, the conservative leader, described the plan as “immoral surrender”, while Nigel Faraj, the UK’s reform leader, told a deputy we are surprised if we find ourselves with the European Union in the customs tariff system.
The plan is increasingly criticized within the Labor Party. Bloomberg said that two cabinet ministers have concerns about the cost of the deal at a time when the general discounts of spending were threatened.
One of the former Labor Party advisers said the class has the ability to become a Tawatiyah case closer to Gordon Brown to sell half of gold reserves in the UK.
Another said that the Chagos deal “was a catastrophic mistake … the best way to solve it now and save the face is to withdraw and say:” We tried to build, and we tried to support the arrangement based on the rules, but Mauritius was completely unreasonable and now it will not be returned. “
Britain continued to control the Shaghus Islands after Mauritius regained independence in the 1960s, and expelled more than 1,000 people to make room for Diego Garcia base. Mauritius maintained that the islands are their own, and the International Court of Justice ruled in a consultant opinion in 2021 that the region’s administration in the United Kingdom was illegal.
After promoting the newsletter
Peter Lamb, the workers’ deputy in Kraouli and West Sussex, who represents a home to about 4000 Shaghous residents, criticized the deal and said that it does not guarantee the right of the island’s residents to return to their homeland. He said: “There is absolutely no guarantee that any of the people who were harmed by the actions of the United Kingdom will benefit in any way of this deal.”
Stephen Dotti, British Foreign Land Minister, said that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is scheduled to take place in the Shaghus Islands next week.
He told the corridors that the deal guaranteed that the Diego Garcia base could continue to work, including by ensuring “unrestricted and only access to the electromagnetic spectrum” over it. Dutti said that if the UK is losing this uniqueness as a result of sovereignty, other countries can reach radio waves above the base.
Navin Ramgolam, Prime Minister of Mauritius, caused a diplomatic dispute after he told his deputies on Tuesday that he rewritten the deal to ensure payments from the United Kingdom in line with inflation. He said that not doing so would have handed the half to Mauritius.
Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Starmer’s spokesman said it was “in fact accurate” that the batch had multiplied and there was no “change” on the cost of the deal or the conditions of the lease.
In response, the Ramgolam government issued a statement that it insisted that it has never been less than that the cost of the agreement had doubled.