Corbyn and Soltana have a half -forming party with enormous potential. Do not delete it yet Andy Picky
DOES Britain need another left party? If you are not on the left – or if you are, but consider yourself realistic – the answer may seem clear. This is a conservative country, which you may believe, in its basic political assumptions, electoral system and media biases. Any party does not fit with this is placed under unbearable pressure. It always shrinks, collapses, collapses, sooner or later.
If even the Labor Party, in which extremist leftists are just a minority, is still not acceptable to many voters and strong interests – as it shows the continuous anger of the right in the Kiir Starmer government sometimes – any government is less than action? Over the past half, in particular, since Margaret Thatcher has successfully undermined the legitimacy of socialism as a major belief system, the left policy area has been severely contracted in this country. Britain has become one of the least leftist democracies in the world.
A series of socialist parties was formed, from respect to the left unit to the Socialist Labor Party, and their expectations are sometimes poisoning, but then decreased quickly. The factions, personal clashes, and ideological differences – that are worse by the phobia of fear of carrying out politics in the conditions of the siege – have resisted these parties to the frustrated termination, or the humiliation of continuity, but on a small scale. For many people across the political spectrum, the British radical left is known as jokes about self -sabotage, delusions and impotence. Unfortunately, fewer jokes are made around the radical right. From Robert Jenrik to UK reform, her dreams realize less fun.
Over the past two months, the past two months, sometimes it has sometimes seemed to follow the Zara Sultana and Jeremy Corbin, these familiar patterns. Despite decades of experience in participants in previous left -wing projects, familiar errors have committed familiar: public rows, lack of powerful partisan structures, prolonged inner length, and sudden explosions that lead to counterproductive results through leading numbers. One of the strategy who was helping to build the party for more than a year says they now feel “misery and anger”, and they have moved away.
However, the feeling of despair (or joy) in your party’s problems is to look at British policy in an Orthodox and narrow manner. The question is the least common, but it is necessary to be asked about the conflicts of such projects is whether they are dwarfing not only the left but our policy in general – at a time when it needs to be desperate.
Britain is widely believed, in a period of poor social and economic crisis like those in the 1930s and 1970s. However, on the contrary, many audiences are separated politically. The elections are lower, and politicians are seen as more similar to each other, political mockery and avoiding government. Even talking about politics in a public place, such as a pub, can lead to strangers to strangers to talk about something else. Leader and cultural theorist Mark Fischer also accustomed to saying, Britain has a depressed economy, but the policy of arrivation: is repeated in a satisfied way, and is ideologically limited-which is owned by the early twenty-first century comfortable and relatively comfortable.
The three most popular parties – reform, employment and conservatives – are tougher on crime and migrants, and postpone major business. All three give priority to the same socially conservative voters. The three three believe that economic growth could be driven by standard cancellation and London, as if the 2008 financial crisis has never occurred.
One of the main reasons for our policies is an effective and angry policies. Without a party that seriously addresses inequality in this country social erosion, exploitative nature and functional mixing of the widespread British facilities and capitalism, and racist legends that dominate the debate on migration and multiplicity, the main policy will continue to move right without a solution, and often the problems they deal with.
Libyan Democrats offer the anti -communications policy, a way out of this session. But the party that also says the agricultural lands must be “exempt from the inheritance tax”, despite the wealth of many land owners and the financing crisis in public services, it is clear that they are as a competitor to the current situation.
The vegetables, under the new left leader, Zach Bolansky, looks suitable for this role. He attacks the elite and defends the aggression more than his party previously, and it attracts activists and thinkers who used to agree with Corbynism, such as James Meadway and Michael Chessum. With the help of your party’s disturbances, green membership has grown to nearly 80,000.
After promoting the newsletter
However, 10 times Many of them participated on the party’s website this summer. Many leftists still accuse their minds around any party, if any, may satisfy their hopes. “The conditions are more suitable for a new party now than last fall” when the hard work began in the project. “Work is less in opinion polls.”
In recent days, Sultana and Corbin made a reconciliation public data. Your party remains in contradictory state: tense, ready to explode in the conflict again, but also a party of rare potential. Corbin He said on Tuesday“I get … huge numbers of messages say:” When [founding] conference? Follow that, I want to go out to the campaigns and want the candidates and I want to see you in the local elections [next May]” ”
With a few political movements around them, it is possible that the conference, which was now scheduled for November 29 and 30, or the public gatherings that include Corbyn and Soltana-Kallah, who had great follow-up speakers-have faded in fighting during the past two months. With the voters who are not calm and rested, your party can win local and parliamentary competitions, and establish itself as a leftist party with influence, as it sometimes exists in continental Europe: a participant in the coalition governments, or at least a party forcing competitors on the left.
However, some of your party’s activists fear their credibility and promise it unchans from the bottom to the top that the project would succeed as it was originally hoped. “What could have been,” as a regulator put it. If it is right, many will celebrate the prevailing policy.
But he did not stop working on the party yet. He says that the large minority of the left -wing British needs a party that explicitly represents them. If not now, when?