Decoding Donald Trump: How does his speech send different messages
Among the critics who were published on Sunday after the Fox News program that presented an argument that surprised me.
Don’t care about what President Trump says, this person wrote. Pay attention to what he is doing.
Now this is a new idea. What the President of the United States says is not important and must be ignored. I doubt that this person applied the same standard for President Joe Biden.
However, there is an interesting intellectual exercise here. Trump says a lot of things, especially as he talks to journalists almost every day. Not everything rises to the same level of seriousness. I say this as a person met several times over the years, including our cars two weeks before the elections.
An interview with Donald Trump: A raid at the last minute and a new closing message
Sometimes, the president says things just to move the press. Sometimes he says incorrect, exaggerated or out of context.
But often the calm part says loudly, and indicates what he plans to do or insult those who disagree with them, which is the type of things that correspondents are used to attributing to assistants whose name has not been revealed, and he does so in front of the cameras.
At the top of the list now it will be Ukraine. Donald Trump is a smart man, and he knows that Russia has invaded its smaller sovereign neighbor with the aim of wiping it from the map and placing it under Moscow’s control. But he chose to blame Ukraine to start the war, and insult Volodomyr Zelenskyy as a dictator when everyone knows that the brand is completely describing Vladimir Putin.
President Trump is known for the rhetoric that is simply everywhere – and some of what he says carries much more than the rest. It is just a matter of determining what it is. (Reuters/Lea Milis)
The most charitable interpretation is that Trump believes that the only way to end the war is through an alliance with Putin for a settlement that can then be sold to Ukraine. (The United States voted with Russia yesterday against the United Nations resolution condemning the invasion.)
Of course, Trump won to Putin for a long time. During the Helsinki summit in the first period, the President before Putin rejected that the Kremlin had penetrated democratic emails, despite the evidence that his intelligence agencies gathered.
Trump has repeatedly repeatedly repeatedly repeatedly bearing the responsibility of the war that celebrated the anniversary of the anniversary for a period of three years. Is this aimed at the American public, Moscow or Kyiv (to pressure Ukraine)?
Eileon Musk’s budget strikes the political reality of the suffering of the Americans
Journalists continue to ask Trump’s assistants and republican supporters whether they agree with President Ukraine’s approach, and many simply tried to change the question.
In an interview “Media Buzz” with Jason Miller, Trump Confidante and a senior consultant for the Trump Transition team, brilliantly avoided the president’s contradiction.
He said: “What President Trump did is that he forced the aspects of the table to stop killing and reach a peace agreement. Over the past few years. Joe Biden has sat completely incompetent, and he does nothing completely, and does not do anything completely. But fueling and financing more From killing and more death. ”
When she tried again, Miller said of his boss that “his legacy would really be a peacemaker.”
I returned for the third time, quoting conservative radio host, Mark Levin, saying: “This is a sick. Ukraine did not start this war. What would they do?”
She asked, “Why does President Trump blame Zelinski for the beginning of the war?”
Trump appears to follow the “blame on Ukraine” approach when it comes to invading the country by Russia. However, there is an important question: Is there a strategy behind it, or is it just released? (Kay Nietfeld/Picure Alliance/Curtis Means/Daily Mail/Bloomberg)
“Well, Zelinski has a lot of blame. I think that will go to this too. But again, you want to look at the past, I want to look at the future, and what we do to save lives.”
Jason Miller was doing his job. A similar scenario played in the other Sunday shows.
In the movie “Fox News Sunday”, my colleague Shannon Bram, Defense Minister Beit Higseth, asked whether it was fair to say that Russia was not provocative when it attacked Ukraine. “It is fair to say it is a very complicated situation.”
Donald Trump’s cruel talk – Boy Greenland! Panama channel restore! It limits many republican rebels
With the assertion that Trump wants to end the war, Higseth said: “You are good, you are bad; you are a dictator, you are not a dictator; I have been invaded, you did.” This is not useful.
Another part of an interview on Sunday shed light on Trump’s use of language.
The president told reporters: “I think we should judge Colombia’s boycott, and make it a flawless beautiful,” the president told reporters.
On Sunday, Defense Minister Beit Higseth was asked whether it was fair to say that Russia was not used when it attacked Ukraine, as Shannon Brem Fox News had been “complicated”. (AP Photo/Michael Probst)
The province has enjoyed the rule of home for 50 years, although Congress maintains the power of its laws. The capital, like most cities, wrestles with crime, poverty and other urban illnesses.
Point Blank asked: Is the president ready to end the home base in the capital?
Miller said that Mayor Morel Bosr is doing a large job, adding: “I think part of the reason for President Trump’s victory is that he said that he will clean our cities to make them safe. Of course he will pressure the Colombia region.”
So Trump’s words in this case had a different meaning, as a warning sign for the region.
Oh, I also wondered why Trump continues to refer to Canada as a 51st country when this will not happen.
“The president enjoys him a little. But he also offers some very dangerous points.”
Click here to get the Fox News app
I was wrong online. It is important to pay attention to the president’s words, especially for the media, which tends to exaggerate his language reaction. The challenge lies in deciphering its symbols when it is serious, when it sends signals, and only when it wanders.