Entertainment

Get it! Harmet Delon explodes the decision of the Federal Judge that parents cannot wear XX wrist – Twitchy


Harmet was not. Delon is only the head of the Civil Rights Department of the Ministry of Justice for a few weeks, but last night she sent a strong indication that the big changes reach one of the most powerful branches of the Ministry of Justice.





Last fall, parents of the girls in the football team at the Sagittarius Secondary School wore the “XX”, to one of the school’s football matches against the Blemouth Secondary School, which had a “passing girl” in her team. This gesture was a clear protest against this injustice, but the Sagittarius School area launched parents from the game and issued an order without disbursement against them.

Of course, some parents filed a lawsuit against the educational zone of this clear violation of freedom of expression and civil rights.

He should have won the championship for the fathers, but yesterday, Riley Jeans tweeted the judge of the Federal Provincial Court Stephen McLev (the width of the astronaut Christta McLev) Have she incomprehensible to the educational area had been spent within its rights.

Madness. The clarification of a biological fact is that men and women are now, now a “insulting confirmation and harassment” aimed at “the man who is trying to cheat in women’s sport.

Bow School was behaving within her authority to expel my mother football from the girls ‘game to wear a pink “XX” wrist as a silent protest against biological males playing girls’ teams, a federal judge said on Monday.

But one of the parents, Anthony Foot, told Nhjournal that he was planning to continue fighting for what women and girls see.

What is our crime? Supporting girls’ sport and defending biological reality? “Foot said.” This ruling is a slap in the face of all parents who believe that schools should be a place of fairness, not a political indoctrination. The judge has publicly admitted that the flags of pride are permitted because they enhance the “inclusion”, but the wrist of women’s sports is prohibited because they may “abuse” someone.

Improved

MCAULIFE justified his ruling by saying that school sporting events are “limited public forums”, so that parents can restrict their rights to freedom of expression.

Soon the decision of the decision reached the Office of the Prosecutor Pam Bondi, who promised that the Ministry of Justice would not take this ruling.

Enter the head of the newly confirmed Civil Rights Department.

We have often wrote about Dhillon in Twitchy of the fierceness of the fighter she was in her career, specifically in terms of fighting against the states of Covid, the ideology of both sexes, and fraud in elections. When Trump nominated her as a general assistant for civil rights, we knew that the change that was needed was coming to the Ministry of Justice.

Last night, Dhillon criticized – at the account of Ner Ner Nent Govaly X – the referee and promised that he would not stand.

As we noticed when Dhillon: Bomity was confirmed.





It is crazy that a federal judge believes that he could escape the reduction of the rights of the first amendment of parents when their wrist does not contain threats or even vulgarity, just biological reality.

They may have become accustomed to the fact that Doj from Biden allowed and encouraged this kind of things, but someone should have told Judge Mculiffe that there is a new honorable city in the city, and that Harmet did not play that.

She thanked one of the parents who are succulents of the Swak Delon for her quick response and promised to investigate.

Imagine this father and the presence of a judge tells you that you cannot speak on behalf of your daughter.

Dilion is far from the Commander of the Civil Rights in Biden Cristin Clark, who would not have regularly leading to the police of the police (as in the Jossi Smolite case), but he also wanted to put men in women’s prisons. (Oh, clearly on Congress on the date of her arrest during the confirmation session.)





Here is the rest of this tweet, which explains how Judge McColev was wrong in the points of law (intentionally or otherwise):

The court refers to 17 pages of “context” before the event, which seems to have nothing to do with the actual events that occurred and were the result of the removal of parents by the school. There was no screaming or harassment of parents in the facts that documented the court (19). Without the possibility of a major disorder or physical intervention in school activities, and without actually occurring (Tinker in 514), it seems that parents do not lose their rights to freely wearing articles of clothes even if the school does not like their speech even in a limited public forum. Happy to do so AagdhillonTeam on that!

This interpretation is in reference to Tinker V. Des mones The case of the Supreme Court in 1969, which confirmed that students can wear black badges in protest against the Vietnam War.

Looking at the fact that other students today publicly wearing enthusiasm and bringing Palestinian flags to protests, with publicly harassing Jewish students, it is difficult to imagine how Mculiffe will stand.

Dhillon is present to ensure the appeal and the first amendment is emphasized.





MCAULIFE is the Moes George is W. Bush, but it is also my party, After joining one of the failed Biden presidential campaigns Again in the eighties.

It is difficult to argue against this point, given his rule.

We are also pleased to have someone who believes in the constitution in the office. We can use many federal provincial court judges who are doing it as well.

Hey, this is what we said again when it was nominated.

For the better, not a very minute.

Harmet Delon is famous for her sewing talents, so we hope that, after achieving it, and after this funny judgment of Mculiffe has turned, it will match some new brands, xx wirbands for parents in New Hampshire who just want to protect their construction from joining men against men.










Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *