John Roberts created this monster. What will he do from it?

The only word left by the Supreme Court from its order last week to return the Salvaduri immigrant was wrongly deported from prison, where he was held in El Salvador, “Please.” To summarize for a short period, Kilmar Abrago Garcia, the Silvadori immigrant, is married to an American citizen and has one child. He has lived in this country for more than ten years, and since 2019 he had a “green card” work permit. He was granted a temporary protected position based on his claim that if he returns to his country of origin, he would be at risk of persecution from Al Salvaduri gangs. He was not arrested.

It was chosen by ICE and customs enforcement agents (ICE) in March 12, and shipped it to a immigration facility in Texas, which was later deported on a trip alongside about 200 members of the alleged Venezuelan gang. His wife met him in a photo of the two traffics who were taken in Al -Salvadouri Prison, CECOT Center (CECOT). She got a lawyer and filed a lawsuit in Maryland, seeking to return him from his imprisonment in El Salvador.

The judge held in the case, Paula Shinis, several sessions, as the government admitted that Garcia, in the words of the Supreme Court, “admits that Abugo Garcia was subject to his blocking matter prohibiting his removal to El Salvador, and that the removal to El Salvador was illegal. Ultimately issued an order directing the United States government to“ facilitate and benefit the return [Abrego Garcia] To the United States no later than 11:59 pm on Monday. Since that date, the Justice Ministry has stopped repeatedly.

Last Thursday, the Supreme Court upheld the order of Judge Shinis and issued his own order, echoing its language that the government must “facilitate” the return of Garcia. Trump said the Ministry of Justice that Garcia is “alive and safe” in prison in El Salvador, however it cannot be returned because he is “detained according to the local authority Al Salvador.” In other words, as soon as the Trump authorities deposited migration and justice, Garcia on the soil of El Salvador, they felt a justification for washing their hands from him, despite their recognition that his deportation was “illegal.”

Trump appeared today in the Oval Office with the President of El Salvador, Nayeb Bokil, who, when he was interrogated by the correspondents, rejected Garcia, saying categorically, “Of course I will not do that.” Although he could put a diplomatic end on the entire issue by claiming Bukele to return the American resident who was illegally deported, Trump sat there and allowed the small head of the State Central State to manage the appearance of the Oval Office as if he was responsible.

While the Garcia issue is called a “constitutional crisis” and “clash” between the executive and judicial branches of the government, what is happening here is an explicit challenge of the law by the President of the United States.

In another challenging act, on Monday, the White House, a correspondent and photographer from the Associated Press from the Oval Office despite his order last week from the provincial judge, Trevor in McFaden, the appointment of Trump, that the administration could not distinguish against AP to issue or access press accreditation data because Trump does not differ with his view to appear in the news.

If Trump’s challenge to two courts is a constitutional crisis, this is one of the jurisdictions. The courts mainly tell Donald Trump that they are ordering it, “do not break this law”, and Trump tells the courts, “I can break any law that I want because John Roberts told me that I can.”

Referring to the Supreme Court’s decision last year to grant Donald Trump and any future president, from immunity from the prosecution of any official acts taken while taking office. The refusal to remove a person illegally deported to the United States is, according to Trump, an official presidential law, so, given the decision to immunity, Judge Roberts, what will you do about it?

Not much, according to the court’s order last week, which Roberts hid by directing the judge of the minimum that the “effect” of the court should be implemented “taking into account the interest in respect due on the executive branch in the behavior of foreign affairs.”

It seems that Roberts does not empty that if the United States is conducting its external affairs illegally, for example, committing war crimes in strengthening American policy goals, the actions of the courts, especially the Supreme Court, are to adhere to laws under its instructions.

The constitution does not contain a clause specifically, “Either we have laws and follow them, or do not do that.” The closest to the constitution is in Article Two, Article 3, where it is assumed that “the president must be keen to implement the laws honestly.” This item is violated every day when Donald Trump wakes up and opens his eyes. He committed the crime of trading from the inside last week, when he relaxed two hours before he relaxed the arduous definitions, published in fact as “a good time to buy!” His friends indicate that the stocks will recover from the diving they took when the definitions were imposed in the first place.

Trump runs a presidency without a law directly in the open and announces this fact every day because it was granted permission from the Supreme Court to ignore not only the criteria and traditions noted by the former presidents, but the law itself.

Today, the immigrant committed to the law is a victim of Trump’s illegal behavior in starkly. The most fearful thing in the first three months of Trump’s second state is not to know where to stand. Unless John Roberts decided to escalate some lines and draw some lines, there are no limits on Donald Trump. Even if that happens, it remains to see whether Trump will adhere to the commitment to the imposed judicial borders. It is already in violation of two local orders and one order of the Supreme Court itself.

We are learning a dark lesson: democracies do not necessarily die in the dark, but in sunlight from the explicit challenge of the law by a president accused of his exile.