Pam Bondi pushed the death penalty in the Luigi manganese case is not related to justice

On Tuesday, Public Prosecutor Pam Bondi Declare What It seems that the second claim of the Trump administration. For the president who loves to create a noise, it is a little surprising that the advertisement made such a large spray. For this reason she chose the administration Luigi Mangion To be a death penalty boy. It is better to help embrace the full sentence of the death penalty more than one of the most alleged killers in America?

Remember the arrest of Magion and the sense of that It led to it. Here is the way Bondi described what Mangarians accused: “Luigi manganese”, she said: “The United Nations CEO, Brian Thompson, on December 4, 2024. The killing was a act of political violence.” Bondi continued that this was a “cold blood assassination that shocked America”.

But the shock was not the only reaction to the killing.

Some Americans Celebrate Revenge from the harsh or indifferent health care system. They dealt with Magon like the popular hero, America Robin Hood. And cnn Reports“Managers got widespread support from an increasing fans base, collecting more than $ 700,000 towards his legal bills.”

This support is the reason that the decision to seek the death penalty issues headlines here and outside.

The federal government in the jurisdiction of the Mangion case is through the state lines to commit its crime. But there was something strange and contradictory in Bondi’s explanation of its decision.

On the one hand, she said she decided only after a “careful study.” On the other hand, it praised its political basis.

From Bondi’s point of view, manganese to death “implement President Trump’s agenda to stop violent crime and make America safe again.”

The death penalty is a serious act. It is bad enough when politicians use it to throw red meat during campaigns. However, it is horrific when the US Prosecutor does. It indicates the extent to which he is considered a judicial sentence.

supreme court Be That when death is a possible penalty, government officials must exercise the maximum care for fear that any person will be treated in an unresolved or trial to meet political necessities. As a center for the death penalty Explain“In the seventies of the last century, the United States Supreme Court announced that” death is different “from all other sanctions, and in this way, it requires the provision of increasing procedural guarantees to ensure that its application was not harsh or unusual.

That is why before January 20, 2025, when President Trump returned to the White House, the Ministry of Justice has gone through a complex operation if any federal public prosecutor wanted to proceed with the trial of capital. Before they can do this, divide the Ministry’s capital case It conducted a comprehensive and comprehensive review of any such recommendation.

He did this to assist the “Public Prosecutor Review Committee on Capital Cases in its evaluation of capital cases submitted by the United States’ lawyer to the Ministry of Justice for review and recommendation to the Prosecutor regarding the appropriateness of the pursuit of the death penalty.” The Capital Case Department analyzed “relevant realistic and legal cases recommending the committee to the Public Prosecutor if the death penalty should be requested.”

Just puts these steps explains the methodology of the decision to move forward in the trial of the capital. But Bondi is moving in a different direction.

Instead of waiting for the public prosecutors to decide on the line if they will request the death penalty, Directed They “search for a death penalty … for the most serious crimes that can be easily proven.” It even ordered the Capital Review Committee to return through the Biden administration decisions not to request the death penalty in the hope of finding cases that the new administration is still doing so.

It seems thirsty for blood. This is the style of the Ministry of Justice that you want to Mit Mangun.

But do not make mistakes, impatience with the deliberative approach to the death penalty decisions stems from the Oval Office. On the first day of his second term, President Trump showed his hand when Release Executive order to restore trials of federal death penalty and deaths.

He declared his command, “From the policy of the United States … confronting politicians and judges who ruin the law by obstructing and preventing the implementation of capitalist rulings …” The Public Prosecutor has directed “to follow up the death penalty for all the crimes of severity demanding to be used … regardless of other factors …”

However, these other factors were specifically, including a careful study of the defendant’s background and the social and psychological conditions that might help explain the reason for their commission of a capitalist crime, which was traditional ponds of shipping decisions and the public prosecutor and the ruling of the jury. Without attending these things, the death penalty becomes a line of assembly instead of an example of the individual judgment that is moved by the commitment to make the punishment be commensurate with the crime as well as crime.

This brings us back to mangis.

There is a long way to go before facing the real possibility of implementation. First, as CNN notes, manganese will be tried in New York on charges of the state.

There was charged there on “11 charges, including one of the first -class murder and two accusations of murder in the second degree, along with other weapons and forgery. He faces life imprisonment without the possibility of conditional release if he is convicted of the state’s charge.”

Only then the Federalists will get their payment. However, the Trump administration appears to be designed to wait for its role, regardless of what New York is doing in the Mangar case.

Even if he was convicted and sentenced to death in a federal trial, this would be years before his execution, assuming that any condemnation has stopped appeal. However, the public prosecutor and the president want to score points now only by announcing that they want to die manganese.

As his lawyer, Karen Friedman Agnevilo, IndicateThe government’s desire to do so is not only bad for its customer. It is bad for this country. It calls that “political” desire. Moreover, in the Mangion case, Bondi’s decision to search for the death penalty “contradicts the recommendation of local federal prosecutors, law and historical precedent.” We have already seen more than sufficient behavior from the Trump administration in other areas; Now, we see that when someone’s life is at stake. In the words of Agnifilo, pushing the Ministry of Justice to the death penalty shows that it was “transferred from the disordered to Al -Hamji.”

This should all worry us, everyone who thinks about mangis as a cold blood fighter or Robin Hood.