Republicans reconsider their commitment to the tax discounts of the wealthy in the Trump Agenda bill

Washington – Republicans are discussing an idea that was long ago a curse within the party: a tax height on the wealthy.

In the development, members of the Republican Party discusses whether tax rates will be allowed to rise to senior potentials when the main parts of the tax law of 2017 ended at the end of this year as part of a huge bill to pass President Donald Trump’s agenda.

The case appeared in special meetings between Republicans in the Senate, as they wrestled with how to reduce red ink and pay the costs of other provisions of the party line package, which includes additional funding for migration and the army.

Senator Kevin Kramer, RN.D, confirmed that there was “some” talk about the higher tax rates for the wealthy in lunch meetings “free flowing”, saying that he finds “interesting” conversation.

“It is very fun to be a Republican these days, just to see the transformation, as people suddenly go – when you think about it, why Do We are very worried about that? Kramer said when asked if he preferred higher taxes over the wealthy.

He said: “If this allows them to rise a little or even lower some other things – there is popularity that grows at the party, even between us with a wig of powder.”

The possibility of such an important shift is driven by electoral natural scenery, as Republicans attract low -income voters and without university degrees, while Americans with high income and learners in the college are drifting towards Democrats.

Voters who received 100,000 dollars or more annually in favor of Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, 10 points behind In 2012But they preferred the Democrats Kamala Harris over Trump with 4 points in 2024, according to exit polls. Barack Obama won the voters who achieved less than $ 50,000 annually by 22 points in 2012, while Trump carried them by two points last year.

Senator Mike Crabo, R-Iidaho, Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee for Tax Writing, kept the door open when asked if he supports the highest higher tax rate when the level of 37 % turns to 39.6 % after this year.

“I will listen to my colleagues. I haven’t made any decision,” Krabo told NBC News.

Steve Bannon, a senior White House official during Trump’s first term and enthusiastic lovers, adopted a popular perspective when it comes to taxes.

In an interview on another topic, Bannon, not swollen, described higher taxes on the wealthy. He said that Parliament Speaker Mike Johnson, R, said, “needs to focus on a significant reduction in spending and raising taxes on the wealthy.”

At an event in the city hall in southeast Iowa on Tuesday, Senator Chuck Grassley has long been asked about the reason that Congress did not make billionaires pay more taxes, a question that attracted applause and chants.

“This may surprise you that the list of possibilities we have on our working paper is that the members of the Finance Committee, and I am a member of that committee, will discuss it from 37 % to 39.6 % in that same group of people you are talking about,” Grasley answered.

But he added, “Now, this does not mean that it will happen.”

In fact, it is far from the fact that the clear Republicans will wander around this idea, as some in the party express the company’s opposition. High -level officials and legislators are ever considering this, which is a maritime change of a party that has long been committed to reducing taxes on observers’ owners. The article of faith within the Republican Party is that the richest Americans help create job opportunities and help raise comprehensive living levels collectively when they are burdened with less taxes.

Senator Ted Cruz, R-TEXAS, rejected the idea of ​​leaving taxes on the highest owners when asked about the idea.

“I think it is a mistake to raise taxes, and I do not think that the Republicans will do it,” he said in an interview.

Fox Business appeared on Tuesday, and the majority leader at home, Steve Scales, R-La, criticized the idea of ​​allowing a higher tax rate higher.

He said: “I do not support this initiative.”

Senator John Cornene, R-TEXAS, said that it has not been sold on the idea of ​​the highest higher tax rate, saying that this step may hurt “companies that end up paying the work income on a personal tax approval.”

In response to a question about whether small companies can get points in these cases, Corn said: “I don’t know. This is an interesting question. I’m sure we may do anything we can agree on, but this will be my anxiety.”

During the first period of Trump, lowering taxes on the wealthy was an indivisible endeavor, as the Republicans made a political strike when they passed the 2017 tax law.

Within Trump’s orbit, the division is clear between populists who want to impose taxes on the richer Americans and traditional Republicans who believe that comprehensive tax cuts are a formula of wider prosperity.

John McLeulin, a Trump survey expert, is concerned that unless Congress passes an extension of tax discounts in the first period, Republicans risk losing their majority in the House of Representatives and the Senate.

By visiting the White House last month, the Chief of Staff, Suzy Wales, gave a survey results that showed strong support for the extension of tax cuts. McLeulin Company The survey conducted For the American Chamber of Commerce.

“Discussions with Suzy Wales have needed to obtain tax cuts, because this is the way you challenge mid -time losses,” McLeulin said in an interview.

“The consequences of leaving Trump tax discounts are the largest tax increase of more than $ 4 trillion.” “If you do not have an increasing economy, it is very difficult to win the elections. I saw both Wisconsin and Florida that Trump’s voters reside at home.”

The majority leader of the Senate, John Thun, said that there is a higher tax chip for the owners of a million dollars “discussed”.

“I don’t know where that will fall, but this is something that we should closely at home and with the White House,” he said. “There are a lot of things, and a lot of proposals, which roam the tax space. In the end, we will have to find unanimity, but the important thing is to make sure that taxes do not rise to the American people.”

Thom Tillis, RN.C, did not support or reject the highest rate, saying that it is a good consideration due to his belief in limiting the cost of the total package.

He said: “I think anywhere we must create at the forefront, you have to look at it.” “I will not quote any figures. I just say at the end of the day, failure is not an option.”

Republicans say that one of the ways to decline the idea of ​​the highest rate with the long -term opposition to the tax height is to remember that on the first day of 2026, taxes will automatically rise.

“We talked about a lot of different scenarios. This is one of the possibilities,” said Senator Mike Roses, Ruby, about the higher tax rate above. “The question is: Is it a tax height, or is it not a tax reduction?”