RFK JR. Consultative Committee to control control of diseases will endanger lives

When Minister Robert F. began. Kennedy Junior is his work as Minister of Health and Humanitarian Services pledge“We will not take the vaccines of anyone.” However, the last policy changes under his leadership – with Unprecedented Among all the 17 members of the Consultative Committee for Evidence practices at the ACIP Center (ACIP) on June 9-this statement has proven false, raising serious concerns about the response of Kovid-19 in our nation and wider vaccine policies. These transformations not only endanger public health, but also threatening to wear confidence in our health institutions at a critical time.

In May 2025, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has introduced a new Covid-19 vaccine rangeReducing access to updated vaccines for Americans between 65 years old or older or those who have specific risk factors. Moreover, Secretary Kennedy announced that CDC control and prevention centers no longer recommend Covid-19 vaccines for “healthy” children or pregnant women-classifying the standard ACIP review.

Increasing these changes, the sudden removal of the completely independent experts in ACIP, who directly directed the evidence -based vaccine policy, risk destabilizing the cornerstone of public health. These procedures collectively restrict access to a vital tool to save lives and undermine confidence in our health systems.

Read more: What to know about RFK JR. Remove all experts from the Display Center vaccine committee

During my state as a public surgeon under the first Trump administration, we faced great challenges to public health, from treating the opioid material by increasing access to Naluxon to launch the speed of warp in the process of developing Covid-19 vaccines. The vaccines developed under Trump Province have proven that it is one of our most effective defenses against Covid-19; However, the new policies of the current administration limit their availability, which may leave weak millions. The ACIP experts – without a clear plan to replace them with qualified scientists – the refusal of the institutions in charge of protecting Americans.

The main disadvantage in the framework of the new vaccine is its narrow risk assessment. Although the instant risk of Covid-19 50,000 life In the United States in 2024 – more than breast cancer or Car accidents. The truth is, 75 % Of Americans have risk factors, such as obesity or diabetes, which increase their exposure to severe Covid results. However, the burden is now placed on individuals to identify themselves as a high risk, which creates confusion and contradiction in arrival. Unlike other countries that have central systems to identify individuals at risk, the United States expects patients-who lack easy access to health care-to be transported alone.

Risk evaluation should also be seen in individual conditions that exceed the basic health conditions. A 58 -year -old bus driver or health care worker faces much larger than a remote. By reducing vaccines on specific groups that depend only on the health condition in advance, the policy overlooks these critical contextual differences.

Al-Amin Kennedy’s team argues that there is not enough evidence to support the updated Covid-19 vaccines for healthy Americans under the age of 65, but this claim is unfounded. Years of real world data show that vaccines Save lives and reduce hospitals Through all age groups. During 2023 to 2024 the fall and winter season, 95 % Among those who took the hospital to Covid did not receive a updated vaccine. While the administration cites the policies of the most restricted vaccines for other countries, such compits ignore the unique health scene in the United States, which include high obesity rates, the results of the worst mother’s health, and the unequal access to health care.

Policy also neglects the long issue of Covid, which It affects millions With exhausted symptoms for months or years. Although older adults are at risk of developing severe infections, long long It affects inconsistently Adults between the ages of 35 and 49 – and children are It was also affected. vaccination Reduces risk It is developed by the long Covid, which is a fundamental reason that many healthy individuals choose to stay aware with their vaccinations.

Read more: What is the risk of getting a long length in 2024?

In particular, the decision to end the recommendations of the Covid vaccine for “healthy” pregnant women, which contradict the guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration. Facing pregnant women The increasing risks Of severe Covid results, including death, repetition, and miscarriage. Vaccination during pregnancy is crucial – not only for the health of the mother, but also Infant Protection Less than six months, who cannot be vaccinated and depend on the mother’s antibodies to protection. Research contracts confirm that vaccines, including Covid vaccines, are safely transporting antibodies to newborns, which reduces the risk of severe disease.

The ACIP refusal inflates these concerns. ACIP was a reliable body that relies on science and ensures that vaccines are safe and effective, which provides an endless life through its transparent recommendations. Its members, who were accurately examined for experience and conflicts of interests, provide decisive independent guidelines for public health. Removing it without clear evidence of the risks of misconduct, the rehabilitation of qualified scientists with less experienced voices. This step is nourishing to the frequency of the vaccine and doubt in public health decisions, especially when it associated with the ACIP review of the new Covid vaccine policies.

These changes create uncertainty about who can reach vaccines. Without clear recommendations for diseases control centers, insurance companies may impose their coverage criteria, which may increase the costs of vaccine, which was previously free for most Americans. Health care providers, who lack federal guidance and ACIP, may fight for advice to patients, which leads to a confusing and unfair system that limits the choice – which is “medical freedom”, Kennedy’s minister, who claims Kennedy.

In the end, these measures are threatened with erosion of public health confidence. FDA officials argue that the new framework enhances transparency, but it goes beyond ACIP and its members’ refusal to undermine this goal. Wide data shows that updated vaccines reduce hospitalization rates and death rates, however this guide was marginalized. Such procedures generate doubts, making it difficult to unite the Americans about common health goals.