Schooter Braun called by Taylor Swift Pal

Blake Livley achieved a great victory in her multiple legal war, a legal war of millions of dollars with Justin Balouni, and now Taylor Swift is a completely new battle friend with Get rid of it The enemy of the big star.

I learned to summon the former huge director and audience in the blogger Body Scooter Brown in the sprawling case.

Today’s summons seeks to put any documents and information that Braun has in the work crisis that Melissa Nathan did for End with us exit. Nathan, the defendant participating in the NYE Lively suit against Baldouni and his primary team, was depicted as one of the mastermind behind the alleged Astroturfing campaign against Lively.

Anywhere near any potential settlement, and with the blogging on his background after the dismissal of Monday from his number of $ 400 million against Ryan Reynolds and others, he is scheduled to be tried to trial on March 9, 2026 at the Federal Court in New York City.

Whatever the information that Lively lawyers may acquire from Braun can play a big role in BTS for what really happened IEWU In the aftermath.

The owner of Hybe America, which has a majority stake in Nathan The Agency Group Crisis PR, and former Braun manager in Nathan, and Braun, were mentioned before in the vital issue. Text message in August 2024 from the previous propaganda of Jennifer Jennifer Abel about reports on the appointment of the Ranatan Nathan and a mark to shine his image amid the complaints of discontent with End with us He saw the production, Abel wrote, “At least they did not mention a scooter.”

Levli representatives said they “did not comment on this”, when contacting them on Tuesday. A lawyer has not responded to a blogger to request the deadline for comment, and Braun’s propaganda is Nathan.

It was handed over to the lawyers this afternoon, the summons notification to Brown, who retracted talent management in recent years, comes 36 hours after the blog and its crew.

On Monday, Judge Louis J. Liman is that the propaganda is Leslie Sloan and her company in vision, in addition to The New York Times. This dismissal and warehouse today moves more than the bets if it becomes a digital scene.

Therefore, Brown and Baldouni appeared together at a round 2018 round table on the 2018 men and the #Metoo movement produced by the Wayfareer Studios with the CEO of Jamey Heath (the other defendant in the Levli case) and others. “We are all defective,” Brown notes at one point.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?

Since Lively presented her text message, Nathan and her colleague insisted that he had not crossed any of the dark arts on December 20, Nathan and her colleague insisted that he did not cross any line and did not participate in any dark arts. With unwanted texts in different files, the duo confirms that while they intend to protect their customers from the misconduct from the pulses in the distribution of Sony IEWU They were released, they have never had to hate all of them all on their own.

Although at some point, as mentioned in the correspondence submitted by the court, there is a conversation about “cultivating stories on the weapon of feminism and how people are in [Blake’s] A circle like Taylor Swift, accused of using these “bullying” tactics to get what they want.

The paradox is of the type that Brown is withdrawn to this only two weeks after Swift saw a summons against it that I dropped by the inferior part – who said they got most of what they wanted voluntarily. Of course, less than two weeks ago, Swift also bought a group of her music catalog after six years of brilliant control of the material without knowing the star. Braun bought the Swift’s Old Big Machine brand and everything she owned, like her masters, in 2019. With a lot, in the words of a quick song, Bad Blood was between the two, the acquisition carried out by Kanye West One-Tine West was “the worst scenario”, according to Swift.

This bad situation did not improve even though Brown sells the main recordings of the first six albums in Swift to Shamrock Capital for more than $ 300 million in 2020. Over the years since Brown bought a large machine, Swift has recovered four of those albums, with the results of the “Taylor version” that proved its famous successes to the grammatical victory.

The official for the former director of Justin Bieber comes in The Lively Vs. Baldoni Moss as Jane’s Jin Lawyer Virgin Main Virgin and Newton Various fast food was offered today when it is a chapter with a without it IEWU The co -star really means. On Tuesday, a lawyer called the judgment issued by Judge Louis Lehman as a “complete victory” that witnessed in mid -January the lawsuit filed the lawsuit and extortion against Livli, Reynolds, the propaganda Leslie Sloan and the gray lady who kicks the braking.

Upon set a deadline on June 23, Judge Lehmann allows the blogging and his internal circle with the right to file a new counterfeit complaint that focuses on allegations of arbitrary interference with the contract, related to the biological star and the Metbulls Reynolds, and a violation of the implicit era, for vitality.

As one might expect less than that, Bianian Friedman’s Donor has a buffet on what the separation means, really.

The co -founder of the co -founder of the sinner of the sinner said earlier on Wednesday: “Mrs. Livly and the announcement of the victory of her team are false, so let us be clear about the last referee.” “While the court rejected the requests related to defamation, the court invited us to amend four of the seven claims against Mrs. Livly, which will present additional evidence and allegations issued.”

“This issue revolves around wrong accusations of sexual harassment, revenge and a unavoidable defamation campaign, which Mrs. Livley team describes comfortably as” cannot be tracked “because they can never prove what happened.”

“More importantly, the claims of Mrs. Livly are not real today than they were yesterday, and with the facts on our part, we walk forward with the same confidence that we had when Mrs. Livly and her trusts in this battle began and we look forward to her next deposit, which I will capture,” the lawyer continued. The vibrant is shed to sit for this deposit next month or so, I hear. “We are grateful for the organic display of the audience’s support and the dedication of the Internet community, which continues to cover the issue with discrimination and integrity.”

On the other side of the legal gap, NewtonThe Deputy General Adviser, David Makau, has taken the internal recession to discuss to discuss the use of intuitive meters now. Praise the work that went to December 21, “We can bury anyone”: inside the Hollywood District Machine “ In an effective CRD file, Macau went a very big picture:

I am now sure that you all saw the good news about yesterday’s decision to reject the defamation issue against the New York Times presented by actor Justin in the past and his partners. Our journalists came out and covered carefully and the most important story of general importance, and the court realized that the law is designed to protect this type of press. We will continue to stand in court for our press and for journalists when their work is attacked.

Blake Livley went to California Civil Rights Agency to file an official complaint that she was discriminated with by Justin Baldoni and his partners during the filming “It ends up with us” and that they launched a distortion campaign to harm it after the launch of the film. The public has the right to know the official procedures that were presented to a government agency, which is why the law in every state protects journalists when they submit a report on an official procedure. We also reviewed in our reports on a set of internal messages between the Baldouni and his team, which showed that they were behind an online distortion campaign against Lively. As the judge said, these messages fully supported the facts we presented in our coverage that separated Baldoni’s attempt to decline online. It is clear that the blogging and its lawyers in Hollywood believe that they can use the courts to undermine that report; They were wrong.

If the prosecutors decide to appeal, we are confident that the decision of the day when he rejects the times will lead to any other review.

One of the last ideas: At a time when other news organizations decided to settle baseless claims instead of defending the freedom of the press in court, a blogging decision is a good reminder that the Times decided that the opposite approach was needed at this moment in American history.

Aside from the inference of Donald Trump, he has a lesserening less than two weeks to file a new, vibrant complaint – but, as it was clear for a while, it could be two weeks a long time in this case.