The golden rule of Trump and freedom of expression is freedom of expression in Varage: They are allowed to chat – you are not | Marina Hyde
Pop competition. Who is impressive: “I also learned that he loves his country a lot?” And: “You have written beautiful messages. They are great messages. We fell in love?”
If you answer “Nigel Varage”, I am sorry. Perhaps the leader of the UK reform has spent a week before the party’s pre-party conference-he presented several feet of the American presidential colon-and calls on American legislators in a rhetoric: “At any point you did [the UK] Become North Korea? “But these compliments, Trump, were actually made around Kim Jong Un, dictator … well, you know the rest.
We always want to have it, of course, which is why Trump this week had to settle on Farage smiled a wide smile next to his oval office like the competition winner, while Kim laughed with Vladimir Putin and Shi Jinping in a vast military procession in Beijing, which appeared, among other combat transfers. Good times. If you consider China a great competitor to the United States, you can definitely see the supposed Prime Minister Nigel throwing the United Kingdom as North Korea with Western equivalent. Within a few years, Farage may be grown with laughter while a robot robot in the United States was wandering in the beautiful large ballistic procession in Washington.
However, returning to this day now. Although the sharing of the presidential colon should be kept – use it or lose it! Farraj was apparent in Washington to fail Britain, launching the external focus of a television station that works in the form of taxes for taxes, and begging to help fight “the truly terrible authoritarian situation in which the United Kingdom sank” in freedom of expression.
Before we go, a quick word at this point. UK no In the greatest place in freedom of expression, it can do with a serious rethink about where its priorities lie. Or at least, serious thinking about making it logical. Take those who agree with the leader of the new Akdar Party as “perfectly fit” Palestine’s work did not make any mistake. But also, take FARAGE by himself, and this week’s rings about the “really terrible authoritarian situation” in the United Kingdom, while its foundations were exacerbated in a piece of free hypocrisy of heat. We will reach the full details of that in a minute. But you should not be able to get it in both directions – even if the lessons of the past decade have suggested to people on both sides of the policy that you can.
However, no one on this land is in both directions more difficult than Trump. There is no crime, but do we really have to conduct lectures on freedom of expression from a country where his administration recently wrote a letter to Smithsonian who imposes a review of some of its museums and opponents “according to the executive order 14253, and to restore the truth and rationality to American history”? They added that this compulsory review is “ensuring compatibility with the guidance of the president”, which museums say the things that they want to say.
Do we really have to take it from a country where universities are threatened to reduce them because they do not know the way they want to study? Do we really have to take it from a country where the president attacks the press at every possible opportunity and often seeks to weaken it? Do we really have to take it from a country with a leader who publicly admires a full group of deadly dictators who canceled freedom of expression in their countries? Do we really have to take it from a country to ban books? It shouldn’t be a bad sport, but I think we do not.
Nigel will not agree, of course. In fact, he liked to help them with hypocrisy. Just as Republicans prefer to be appropriately busy with European local laws while their first amendment rights are eroded directly before their eyes, Farage prefers to be preferred to Washington for using it as a single guidance of my party instead of staying at home and participating in a free editor’s horror that he can definitely do something.
For Nottingham, then, although it is not as much as the attractive power of Faraj like Washington, it is a city run by the Council by the Islah party. Just, unfortunately, the leader of the Nutinghamsheer Council, members of the Board of Directors, banned the enrollment in the local press. Last week, Mick Barton announced from the reform that due to a story about the reorganization of the local government, none of the members of the House of Representatives were able to speak to Nottingham Post, or his online arm Nutinghamsheire, or a team of local journalists funded by the BBC. This week, in the wake of a violent reaction against his fundamentalist Hove against freedom of expression, Barton updated to say his ban It only applies to himself. Now, in the aftermath of the Congress Committee in Farage, various contradictions saw that the reform leader was asked: “Do you agree with yourself?” Nigel recently said he was “a small conversation” with Barton.
After promoting the newsletter
For time. Many easier to having balls to “conduct a little chat” with Trump about your interesting understanding of the first amendment-or in reality the deployment of the National Guard/Military Offer/rebellion and election/elections, and away/ally/amnesty for all other things that are sure to have at least the presence of “really amazing and really amazing situation.” Run Britain, and effectively invite it to get a slap with a tariff or two. Nigel may love his country as much as Kim does after all.