The Guardian view on the unpaid work of women: The positions turned, but the burden was not | Editorial

IN 1987, just less than half of the population – 48 % – He still believes The main man’s job was to earn money, and the woman to care for the home, according to British social situations. By 2022 it decreased to 9 %. Although the percentage of women in full -time jobs RiseThe domestic work burden remains unfairly on their shoulders in captivity of two different sexes-while husbands of the same sex tend to divide it evenly. Men do more than they did, but women still do more – even when they are the main family, US research It has shown. Beliefs have turned, but behavior has proven to be stubborn.

Global, at the United Nations I mentioned Women do more two and a half times work in the family and care more than men, equivalent to 10 % -39 % of GDP of member states. In the United States, the analysis indicates that women – who make up half of the paid workforce – represent approximately 80 % unpaid household chores: 3.6 Trighter annually. However this work Not included in the gross domestic product In many countries, they are ignored or identified adequately when it comes to divorce.

So a new book on a half-century-old campaign- Home Acts: Action Story, Idea, Promise – It serves food to think today. Professor Emily Colosy follows the history and influence of the polarized feminist Marxist movement.

“They say it is love – we say it is an unprecedented work,” books Silvia Vidity, one of its founders. It was not just that a woman’s work was not recognized and unrecognized, and that women lack autonomy as a result. It was also about the realization that the improper work is an integral part of capitalism, the preservation of the souls and bodies necessary for the paid work with smiles as well as hot dinner. The campaign also argued that the women’s paid workers are less valuable when they reflect the underestimated work they are already doing.

The movement was international and provinces, as the groups are waged due to lesbians and black women to obtain household wages. But it was always a small strand in The second female wave It is still controversial. Her main numbers are divided. a lot He saw that He also invites capitalism to the home, encouraging women’s landing in this field, or enhancing the unconventional local burden. In response, Salma James, one of her founders, accused Feminities of the middle class of ideal for the workplace: “I have waited, packed sweets, wire TVs protected on the assembly line. Editing did not seem like this!” She wrote.

Some of the activists demanded wages as a practical solution, while others saw the idea as a tool to challenge deeper regular problems. In Professor Calaci words“The starting point for a more fundamental transformation of our political imagination: evoking an organized world about care instead of capitalist growth, destroying the environment, and unjust productivity.”

This may mean, for example, pushing farmers to support nature rather than producing food. The movement inspired the suitability of prisons, members of the Ni UNA Menos campaign in Argentina against male violence, paid home workers’ organizers, and global basic income. It now requires income For all sponsor workWhether it is from the people or the planet. It is not just an issue whether we can not pay for the cost when we do not appreciate what matters.