The Guardian view on UK’s positions on Europe: The work is following the place it can lead Editorial
forRetin’s relationship with the European Union was not a prominent issue in the national debate when Sir Kerr Starmer became prime minister, and Downing Street mocked him to keep him in this way. Workers’ strategists saw Europe as an explanation, and the opposition of Sir Kiir to Brexit in the 2016 referendum as a responsibility with swinging voters. Prime Minister, Britain, transferred closer to Europe, but with shy increases. The summit that “reset” the official relations of this year was long on the aspiration data, but it is short on the essence. The government’s recognition that economic logic is due to Britain to a European orbit that was constantly tense with the fear of making this issue in public places.
The balance seems to be now turning. In a speech on Wednesday, Nick Thomas-Simmonds, Minister of Cabinet Office responsible for European Union relations, presented the argument related to the organizational organization with Brussels in new terms. The government is negotiating an agreement that will cancel the costly checks and licensing requirements for food and drink exports to the continent. Mr. Thomas-Swindz expanded his call to this plan to attack the conservatives and reform the United Kingdom to tour the “snake oil” and Britain wishing to fail by denying the need to cooperate in the European Union.
Mr. Thomas-Simmonds enthusiastically spoke about the proposals of the “Youth Experience” scheme, which allowed children from 18 to 30 years to travel and work in the Schengen region with extended visas in exchange for reaching the United Kingdom for continental visitors.
This has been offered long ago in Brussels, but the ministers were initially sensitive to the possibility for fear that it would be mistaken in an agenda to restore the level of the free labor movement associated with the membership of the European Union, or to distort them sarcastically in these terms.
It is not something like that. Evidence of polling indicates a clear majority support for a program that will open, for limited time periods, new European opportunities for youth. This barely surprised when opinion polls also show dissatisfaction with Britain’s exit from the European Union and its consequences that are widely reflected in the political discussion of the issue. A clear majority says it was A mistake in leaving European Union.
This should not be confused as prepared to undergo the type of disturbances and social division that will be required by a campaign to join the union. But this indicates that the government can be more aggressive in its criticism of Boris Johnson Brexit, and more courageous in the face of the extremist European minority that has been transferred somewhat long ago in talking about the entire nation.
Although Nigel Faraj pledged to contradict the closer of the Labor Party with the European Union, the UK reformist leader is noticeably hesitating to defend Britain’s exit from its axis to become the Prime Minister. In fact, none of the great priests seems everywhere everywhere they are keen on achieving their dear goal. This is a gap in the opposition that the work should be used with more power.
The failure of Britain’s exit from the European Union to provide any of its announced rewards, in addition to the challenge of protecting the unreliable protection in Donald Trump in Washington, making an indisputable issue for Britain to search for greater strategic intimate through the continental bloc on its doorstep. The government moves in this direction, but it is very hidden, behind public opinion, after the place where it can be a leadership.