The ministers say Health policy
The ministers announced funds for hospitals in England with the assessments of patients, as the ministers warned, as one of the health chiefs in charge of implementing the government plan for a period of 10 years of NHS in the country warned that they faced an existential threat unless it was re -connected to the public.
The procedure, according to which health care providers can lose a percentage of their financing if patients are unhappy, is part of the package that the Minister of Health hopes to stimulate investment in services that can prevent the need for hospital visits – and to encourage more patients listening to patients.
But doctors expressed concern about the risk of suggestion to perform NHS surgery using a sharp tool, instead of the required scalp.
Under the proposals, which were first reported in the Times, patients should be asked if they want to continue to care for their service to the service they used, or if the percentage should go to a regional box instead. According to the Times, about 10 % of “standard payment rates” can be transferred if the patient is unhappy.
The Ministry of Health and Social Welfare said on Saturday: “This will be presented as there was a busy record of very bad service and the evidence that patients are not heard,” adding that it will be operated at first as a trial.
But Matthew Taylor, CEO of the NHS Federation, said: “None of our members raised this idea with us as a way to improve care, and as far as we know, there is no other health care system that is currently adopting this model.”
He said: “The patient’s experience is determined more than their individual interaction with the doctor, and unless it is not designed and evaluated very carefully, there is a risk that service providers are punished for more regular problems.”
Other measures are designed to help treat people in society – before they need hospital. “If patients are unable to get a GP date, which costs NHS about 40 pounds, they end up in A& E, which cost up to 400 pounds,” said Wespish Minister of Health.
This came, as the new NHS president in England said that the service “built mechanisms to preserve the audience away.” “We have made it very difficult, and perhaps we were all at the end. I got a relative in the hospital, so you are ringing a number on a wing that no one will answer at all. The suite writer only works on nine to five, or they are busy doing other things; the GP practice is floundered every morning,” Sir Jim Makki told Telegraph.
Maki warned that the separation between NHS services and the public may completely lead to the loss of public health service. “The great anxiety is: If we do not adhere to that, and we do not deal with it at a pace, we will lose the population. If we lose the population, we lose NHS.”
Streeting said on Wednesday that the 10 -year government plan also aims to “address one of the most prominent aspects of health inequality”, which he claimed is not equal to information and choice when it comes to health care.
“We have to redirect it in one way or another, think about how to find people who need us, and how we stop thinking:” it will be pain in the donkey if it appears because I am very busy, “Maki said, and instead, we think about how to discover what you need and get it.”