The Trump administration must rehabilitate thousands of divorced workers, the rules of the judge
On Thursday, a federal judge ordered six federal agencies to rehabilitate thousands of workers who have a situation under observation as part of President Trump’s initiative for the government.
Ruling on the bench, Judge William J. C. Likes from the American Provincial Court of the Northern California region to California to further than it was, as it was found that the Trump administration’s launch of monitoring workers was mainly made illegally and through the employee management office and the human resource arm of the government.
The Ministry of Treasury and the Affairs of the Old Warriors, Agriculture, Defense, Energy, and internal departments to comply with his order and offer to return any employees who have been incorrectly terminated. His order stems from a lawsuit filed by employee unions that challenge the legitimacy of collective fire.
Judge Alsup concluded that the government’s actions were a “way to circumvent” designed to carry out the mass fire urgently.
He said that it is clear that federal agencies have followed directives from the Personnel Management Office to use a loophole that allows them to shoot at test workers collectively on the basis of weak performance, regardless of their actual behavior in the job.
He said: “It is a sad day when our government releases some good employees and says he was dependent on performance when they knew well and good this is a lie.”
He added: “It was a trick to try to avoid legal requirements.”
Before the ruling was issued, Judge Alsup was keen to clarify with lawyers who represent unions that are still orders to “reduce strength” that have now been issued in many legal agencies and could be able to move forward.
He said that he said that his discovery was that the previous wave, which was recommended by the employee and administration office, was not a mitigation of the executive authority, did not stand in the way of an appropriate process.
“If this is done correctly, there may be a power reduction within an agency, and this should be true,” said judge Alsup.
He added: “Congress itself has said that you can have an agency that could lead to a decrease in force, if this is done correctly under the law,” he added, adding a recognition by a lawyer representing the unions.
Judge Alsup had originally planned that Trump administration officials testify to the operation through which workers’ demobilization was planned, but on Wednesday, the government made it clear that Charles Ezel, head of the Personnel Management Office, will not appear.
The judge’s decision on Thursday, which also extends a restriction last month to prevent the employee management office from coordinating more collective shootings, and submitted a temporary postponement of federal workers’ unions that resisted Trump administration initiatives.
Daniel Leonard, a lawyer representing the unions, once again noted during the hearing that the directives had a devastating effect on agencies, by executing younger workers and new graduates, but even the recently promoted civilian employees and were in a losing period in their higher positions.
She said: “This procedure by OPM made the Swiss cheese of federal agencies at every level.”