Wes Streeting “high risk” will reduce 10,000 jobs NHS
WES Streeting has ordered the reorganization of NHS “high risks” that will cancel 10,000 jobs in an attempt to free money for frontal lines care.
Experts have warned that the transition to cancellation of NHS England and their twisting in the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (DHSC) could distract the ministers’ attention from the urgent job of ending the long waiting for treatment, while the unions have expressed concern about the “Champolic” declaration of job discounts for public employees.
However, the Minister of Health said that the transition to cancel the “largest in the world” will return the ministers responsible for the health service while providing hundreds of millions of pounds that can be better spent on doctors and nurses and improving care of the confrontation line.
“I now tell people who resist this reform out of the love of NHS, do not kill him gently,” said Streeting.
The decision to cancel NHS England, announced by the Prime Minister on Thursday, is a dramatic reflection of unpopular changes in NHS, which was made by the conservative conservative coalition government for more than a decade.
The former Minister of Health, James Bethel, said that he hopes that the conservatives would “have the courage to do so,” while Jeremy Hunt, the former Minister of Health, praised the “boldness” of the proposals.
The plans revealed, Care Starmer said that this step would “reduce the bureaucracy” and the health service administration “return to democratic control”, while the street said it was it “The final nails in the coffin of the catastrophic reorganization for the year 2012, which led to the longest waiting times, the least satisfaction of the patient and the most expensive NHS in history.”
Whitatol sources said that the street made a decision that NHS should be canceled earlier this year amid frustration with the duplication with DHSC, and that Starmer was on board the entire idea.
The aim is to restore responsibility, but they put an end to accurate forgery by a central power of the arm and enabling hospitals and local health authorities to make their own decisions on how to improve.
Sincerity, the street has become deeply frustrated due to the inability of NHS to improve waiting times, make hospitals work better and stop spending, as well as to make strategic changes in the way it works, such as increasing community care to reduce the demand for A & E, despite its budget and the strength of work in recent years.
“By reducing the layers of the red tape and ending childhood from NHS leaders in the front lines, we will launch the local NHS provider for free in innovation and develop new and fruitful ways to work and focus on what matters more: providing better care for patients,” he said to the Workers Council.
Those close to the street said that he carries a view shared by the last health secretaries in R.
One of the well -known people said that the streets came to see NHS England as “responsible for everything, but it does not seem to be able to fulfill the most important things for politicians.”
The repairs are expected to take two years, provide up to 500 million pounds and lead to half in the size of the integrated DHSC and NHS England, which combined 19,000 employees.
However, there were warnings that the reforms attempts could risk linking the health service to an expensive and time -consuming bureaucracy, while Unison, a pioneering union among health staff, said the advertisement “left NHS employees in England.”
“Just a few days ago, they learned that their numbers have been reduced by half, and now discovered that the employer will stop exist,” said Christina Magania, Secretary -General Longon. “The way the news of the ax was treated is no less than Champolic. It could definitely be managed in a more sympathetic way. Thousands of expert staff will leave wondering what their future hides.”
After promoting the newsletter
BMA, the Labor Union of Doctors, said it “transports high risks from the government: without NHSE as a buffer between it and the delivery of health care to patients, Back will now stop with the Minister of Health.”
“The experiences of the NHS reorganization were not positive. This should not become a distraction from the decisive task awaiting us: dealing with the historical workforce crisis, dropping waiting lists and restoring the family doctor,” said Professor Phil Banfield, head of the BMA Council.
Three Health Thinktanks, The King’s Fund, Health Foundation and Nuffield Trust were also reservations about resources and energy that the changes would address.
“Deep problems facing NHS still: how to meet the patient’s increasing needs in the face of escalating waiting lists, and how to invest in care near home with broader NHS funds already underwater and social welfare repair,” said Thia Stein, CEO of NFFILD TRUST.
She said: “It is not immediately clear that rearranging the position of strength at the top will make a big and immediate difference in these issues, which will ultimately be the way patients and government rules against the government.”
However, the sources said that Sir Jim Makki, behind Amanda Bretshard, CEO of NHS England, is expected to be more difficult to demand the service that the service will work to improve its performance clearly and quickly.
In the House of Commons, the street praised Maki because of its “distinguished record of transforming NHS organizations, budget books, leadership leadership and leadership leadership.”
The Minister of Health, by virtue of Professor Ara Darzi, was martyred in his review of the Fall NHS that the establishment of NHS England in 2012 by Andrew Lansley, then the Minister of Health, as part of a huge reorganization in light of the Tory/LIB Dem alliance, was “catastrophic … quantity without an international category”.
-
Join Wes Streeting in a conversation with PipPa Cierar to discuss the health and social care system in England and how the Labor Party plans to convert it on Tuesday 25 March 2025, 7 pm to 8.15 pm (GMT). Book tickets here or in Guardianive.com