Why not make us weight loss medications alone in good health
We enter a new era of obesity. The science of weight loss has changed forever: medications such as Ozmpic, Wegovy and Mountjaro help millions in weight that they believed was impossible to lose. At the same time, the search for the role of foods that are equipped with obesity, diabetes and heart disease reveal, even after calories alone.
But despite all the breakthroughs, governments are stuck. Between the pharmaceutical revolution on one side and the food industry, a trillion dollars on the other hand occurred, and they faced a distinguished question: Will we settle for obesity, or will we finally deal with its causes?
Because this is the uncomfortable truth: unusual weight loss medications, but it is not a single solution.
Scientific penetration – a political dilemma
The GLP-1 drugs were not less than the miracle for many. Originally designed for diabetes, it suppresses appetite and helps people lose 15-20 % of body weight. Patients with type 2 diabetes see blood sugar normalization. The rates of heart attacks and strokes decrease. It may be useful for neurological degenerative diseases such as dementia. some Estimates He suggested that, if it is widely put forward, the GLP-1S can provide up to three million life every year.
Read more: Battle of brewing on the entire milk
Now, with cheaper versions of entering the market in India, ChinaCanada, and other countries, the scope of these drugs expands faster than anyone expected.
But this is the dilemma: If governments focus on medical prescriptions rather than prevention, they risk solid surgery in the next generation.
Extraordinary problem
We now know that very treated foods (UPFS)-artificial groups of duplicated carbohydrates, seed oils, sugars, additives and flavors-do not make us only increase weight. They change biology. They raise blood sugar, lead inflammation, and disrupt satiety signals, and in many cases, they are designed to keep us eating in the past.
In the United Kingdom and the United States, More than 60 % From the average diet now comes from these foods. These school lunch meals. Hospital sale machines. Cheapped supermarket. The problem is not just access; It is an environment. These products are located everywhere, and are marketed unabated, and are often cheaper than whole foods.
However, science is not without Controversy. Some researchers argue that UPFS is a very wide category that is not useful, as you collect yogurt and full bread for grains with potato chips and candy. Others suggest that a lot of damage does not come from the “treatment” itself, but one of the factors we already understand – magic, salt, fat, energy density, even texture and even eating speed. In a historical study in the National Institutes of Health, people took 500 other calories a day on a very processed diet than in a non-processed system-even when foodstuffs are matched-because foods were smoother, faster in eating, and more intense energy.
Micro -mechanisms are still discussing. But the bottom line is not. Populations who eat more UPFS become more sick and smaller.
GLP-1 can calm biological driving to excessive eating. But they cannot change the fact that children grow up in a diet designed to make them sick.
Governments at a crossroads
This is the policy makers now. On the one hand, there are pharmaceutical companies that are paid for wider drugs for a changing weight loss. On the other hand, the food giants are severely pressed against the restrictions imposed on advertisements, warning posters, sugar and salt taxes. In the center: the governments were paralyzed due to the fear of accusing them of operating a “nanny country”.
But the real nanny is not a government. It is a big food. It is an uncompromising marketing forms the tastes of our children before they can read. They are the supermarkets designed to start purchases. It is the food environment that keeps us addicted to products that are not satisfied with hunger, but to keep us back to more.
Read more: Why is it very difficult to make school lunch more healthier
This is the nanny that quietly leaked us from our freedom. Because real freedom does not choose between two forms of treated garbage; It is the ability to raise a mountain without pain, mile swim, or simply feel comfortable in your body. Millions of people are deprived of freedom every day – not through the power of weak will, but through a system designed to make an unhealthy life default. Until we face it, we will continue to choose a choice.
The result? Additional change, when what is required is bold work.
Play book for real change
The GLP-1 era should be an incentive, not a crutch. Here is what governments can do today to break the course:
1. Fix the food environment
Bring unwanted food ads for children. Put clear clear warning stickers on volatile foods, such as Chile did great success. Imposing taxes on the worst criminals, and use revenues to make the most healthier foods cheaper.
2. Invest in prevention, starting with children
Education education in each school. Building gardens until children understand where their food comes from. Make daily physical activity routine like mathematics and reading. Japan, which has some of the lowest obesity rates in the world, includes food education in its national curriculum – and works.
3. Make drugs part of a wider strategy
The GLP-1S should not be a free pass for food industry, and should not be used in isolation from others. It should come with counseling, nutritional education, and long -term support to build healthy habits.
Why do it matter
Nothing is about the disgrace of individuals. Obesity is not the failure of the will of will; It is a predictable response to an environment designed for excessive consumption.
The question is whether we want to normalize that environment and rely on the weekly injection indefinitely, or whether we want to build a world in which a number of people need drugs in the first place.
Read more: The heavy cost of using weight loss medications to get skinny
The risks are not only personal. Obesity already costs the American economy It is estimated at 1.4 trillion dollars A year in the costs of productivity and health care lost. In the United Kingdom, the number Nearly 100 billion pounds. These numbers will only grow unless we turn from interactive care to prevention.
A specific option
I am not hostile to the blog. Far from that. GLP-1S is one of the most exciting medical breakthroughs in the last century. They will save millions of lives.
But drugs alone will not create a culture of health. Children will not know how to cook. Our children will not suddenly make immune from unwanted food ads. They will not stop the aggressive pressure that maintains the lowest healthy calories.
This moment – science, food and politics collision – is an opportunity to do something bigger: to make a healthy option is an easy choice, for everyone.
If we missed, we risk creating a future that is very similar to our present: where obesity is managed, not prevented.