Why not tyranny? JD Vance says he is fine with “inevitable errors” to abandon due legal procedures

It can be difficult, live in a free society. In places where the rule of law prevails, and where all people – citizens, criminals and migrants are believed – they consider to enjoy some inalienable rights, guilt or innocence by an independent judiciary and a jury of their peers. Even when the facts of the issue are not waived, freedom and justice requires that the accused be judged by mobs, or any one person, but through a length process where they are entitled to challenge the evidence against them.

Have you ever been sure of something, just to prove a mistake later? This happens to governments, even when they consist of people who do their best to make sure of the truth; Legal procedures work to protect everyone from a serious mistake, but also have guarantees against the possibility that one day the country will run by those who do not act in good faith at all.

This process is not perfect, and in fact the current criminal justice systems tend to not reduce the ideal: sometimes the comet is descended, and the innocent is condemned. But it beats the alternative: tyranny.

In a tyrannical system, the defendant’s guilt is determined by their accusation in the first place. If the government says that someone is terrorist, they will be dealt with accordingly. There is no appeal, and there is no official operation at all beyond the permit: the terrorist; sinner.

This is the system that the Trump administration wants for everyone to live in America-where the word is a 78-year-old man and its forms are enough to justify the sending of anyone to a foreign prison for the rest of his life.

To date, this goal was very implicit. Hundreds of men have been sent to a notorious detention facility in El Salvador where, according to the administration, they will spend the rest of their lives. All of them were distorted as terrorists and gang members, however The vast majority It was never convicted of the stolen stores – in the United States or anywhere else. Among them is a barber from Venezuela, a gay man who was classified as a member of the Trine de Aragoa gang on the basis of a former police officer, as he disturbed him in applying the law after that It is said His car was destroyed, while drunk, in the family home. Another is 19 years old Those who entered the country legally and had a permit to work, but were seized by ice agents during an operation that was targeting another person.

The most prominent case was the case of Kilmar Abrago Garcia, a man in the state of Maryland, who admitted the lawyer of the Ministry of Justice that he had been eroded by the country as a court had previously issued a protection from the deportation order (that the lawyer of the Ministry of Justice has had since since then Fire has been launched For his sincerity). The Trump administration made a series of excuses after reality because of this father and union, the trainee of the opportunity to see his family again, focusing on the claim that he was a member of the MS-13; As with the barber, this is also a claim based on the testimony of an unreliable policeman – one of them later Admit To give secret police information to the sex factor, according to the new republic.

No real court on Alago Garcia was sentenced to life imprisonment due to this weak evidence (White House press secretary Caroline Levitte, on Tuesday, on Tuesday Further A claim crime, has never been confirmed in a legal file: human trafficking. The lack of real evidence of any sin, much less than the type that argues that he will be deprived of freedom forever, is the reason that he has never been presented before the court – and for this reason, most likely, President Donald Trump challenges an order from the Supreme Court to facilitate his return to the country, which may risk speaking freely about his lover and the circumstances in the prison that no one ever had ever.

But one does not need to collect what the Trump administration is really thinking about due legal procedures and the rule of law. On Tuesday night, Vice Vice President JD Vance explained that the intention is to challenge the legal principles dating back to ancient times, or the bouquet of those who insist on respecting the rights of “many immigrants” who do not hold documents “committed violent crimes, or easy fentanel and sex trafficking.”

“To say that the administration must notice” due legal procedures “is to beg to the question: What is the process due is our resources function, the public interest, the status of the accused, the proposed punishment, and many other factors”, Vans books On social media. “It is to put it in concrete terms, the imposition of the death penalty on an American citizen requires more legal process than an illegal foreign deportation to their country of origin.”

Ignoring that hundreds of people who were sent to El Salvador have never entered that country before, Vans shook his main point of view: It is extremely difficult to provide “illegal foreigners” with anything similar to the legal procedures that you know, as you know, “produces mistakes.” Because the trial of the jury is exhausting, and justice is still not guaranteed, why do you care about any process at all?

“What I agree with is the fact that any human system will produce errors. Moreover, I accept the actual barter: Between not imposing the law and the law imposing. I chose the latter despite the inevitable errors,” Vans wrote.

Frankly, the Vice President of the United States argues to embrace the distinctive tyranny, as the membership depicted in the category – “illegal foreigner” – is sufficient to issue a single person’s sentence to life imprisonment without asylum. Despite his framing to apply to foreign newborn, deprived of the rights given by their Creator, there is no need to say that this constitutes a threat to a slippery slope: the government that has already expelled legal immigrants is clear that such fear of the batch in order to be frank from prices. “

It is difficult to live in a free society and a free society more difficult; It is difficult, still restored as soon as she leaves. History will judge the place where America stood about 90 days in the second presidency of Trump, but this is certain: at the moment when one group of law is exempt, no one is safe from volatile slag from a trivial tyrant – and if no one resists such an attack on civilization, freedom is lost.