Wired, Wikipedia drops visits on “far-right” Grokipedia – Twitchy
Version 0.1 of Grokipedia, the AI-powered alternative to Wikipedia, is up and running, so of course, everyone with Elon Musk Syndrome is trying to delegitimize it. If you go to the Wikipedia entry on Grokipedia, you’ll get this:
Wikipedia has already dropped a hit article on Grokipedia, they are very afraid of it 😂 pic.twitter.com/BIbQEmxl7Q
– SMX 🇺🇸 (@iam_smx) October 28, 2025
The Wikipedia entry has since been updated, but it originally read, “Grokipedia is a conservative AI-powered online encyclopedia developed by xAI, an artificial intelligence company founded by Elon Musk, which launched on October 25, 2025.”
Wikipedia editors launched an article about their biggest competitor: Grokipedia. The article is full of lies about the platform, describing it as a “manipulated, AI-inclined, AI-powered online encyclopedia” by Elon Musk. They pat themselves on the back… pic.twitter.com/d4iG4qxjWT
– Ian Miles Cheung (@Stillgray) October 28, 2025
“…It’s over. But they’re afraid. They’re terrified.”
Wired also joined the criticism with more accusations that Grokipedia is “alt-right,” a term that has become increasingly meaningless due to overuse and abuse.
Kids today wouldn’t believe it, but there was a time when Wired published the most fascinating tech deep dives you could find pic.twitter.com/r2p3HZomV2
-Austin Allred (@Austin) October 28, 2025
Wired, The Atlantic, The Guardian, and many other propaganda publications would die instantly if they had to fend for themselves. Donations from far-left organizations disguised as charities are what keep them alive.
It’s just a way to influence Wikipedia,… https://t.co/6zzXpbxrtf
– Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 28, 2025
Recommended
“…Google and others as fake ‘reliable’ sources.”
Wikipedia: “Conspiracy theorists claim COVID-19 leaked from a laboratory”
Grokipedia: “Experts divided, here are sources for home report on lab leak and scientific sentiment studies”
amazing! I’m really incredibly impressed.
I will never use Wikipedia again… https://t.co/whZrKozI25 pic.twitter.com/xD2tm4c0nK
– Arthur Macwaters (@ArthurMacwaters) October 28, 2025
The post continues:
… once again. Grokipedia is obviously more factual and unbiased, and easier to read source documents.
This is v0.1 only!
Elon/xAI has really cooked with this one. This will fundamentally reshape the way humans consume knowledge
🚨 🇺🇸 GROKIPEDIA VS Wikipedia: two versions from January 6
The Grokipedia entry describes January 6 as a riot—realistic, chronological, and controlled.
He cites crowd abuses, security failures and prosecutions without specifying political intentions.
Wikipedia calls it an “attempted coup”… https://t.co/WHJX68rel pic.twitter.com/i70gHWdsdM
– Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) October 28, 2025
The post continues:
…in the first line, portraying it as a deliberate plot by Trump and his supporters to overturn the election.
Same event. Two novels.
Single reports. The other is editorials.
Source: Grokipedia / Wikipedia
It only took Wikipedia hours to explain why Grokipedia was needed.
– Ebenezer (@mortsnavs) October 28, 2025
Wow, they’ve created the absolute perfect example of why Wikipedia needs an alternative.
— ItIsMeHere (@amMeButYouRu) October 28, 2025
I think our obnoxious “reverence for truth” is getting in the way of their beliefs and narratives once again. How inconvenient for Wikipedia. Next, lots and lots of donation pages. Farewell.
-Bob Piciano (@bobpicciano) October 28, 2025
I’m afraid 😈🤣 pic.twitter.com/0NXzHTdNzj
– Elena (@Xerendipitist) October 28, 2025
— ⬣ Black Squirrel (@Blacksquirreltr) October 28, 2025
My favorite part is when they mention that the article about Elon Musk didn’t mention the supposed Nazi salute pic.twitter.com/kCw6OIY7KK
-Zen (@Zen_Ozma) October 28, 2025
The Wikipedia article is an excellent example of the importance of Grokipedia. It’s almost repetitive. He talks about his competitor and thus justifies the competitor’s existence.
– Justin Mincher (@DrVonSteiner) October 28, 2025
If this is the level of Wikipedia’s collapse, imagine how funny it would be if Elon had a Reddit competitor.
Reddit mods will lose all that’s left of their minds.
– Matthew Talmage (@realMTalmage) October 28, 2025
Here is the link. It’s hard to find in a Google search.
How about someone make an unbiased browser.
– Stuart Willems (@stuartwillems) October 28, 2025
Wikipedia is ☠️ ☠️. Just don’t know that.
He can’t compete with Elon financially. Always asking for money. I woke up broken.
It is not possible to compete due to biases that would be historically evident as a driving reason for building Grokipedia.
– Jon Weiss (@jonweiss78) October 28, 2025
They have just proven the need for Grokipedia
🤣
– Fall of the Empire (@TheFallOfEmpire) October 28, 2025
I stopped using Wikipedia a year ago in favor of AI-driven searches. Wikipedia has too many incorrect entries. One of the reasons people asked Elon Musk to create Grokipedia was because they knew he would verify the information first. There is no bias. No opinions. Just facts.
– Martha Johnson (@MarthaJohn1679) October 28, 2025
Nothing destabilizes a regime more than challenging its monopoly on moral authority.
— DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) October 28, 2025
Try Grokipedia. It won’t ask you to donate and will give you a more credible look at whatever it is you’re looking for.
***
Editor’s noteSchumer closes here. Instead of putting the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats imposed a government shutdown of health care for illegal immigrants. They own this.
Help us keep reporting the truth about Schumer’s suspension. Use the promo code POTUS47 To get a 74% discount on your VIP membership.