The Guardian view on class policy: It faded with the high cultural wars Editorial
EARLY in 2010s, the class policy was everywhere. Bankers were rescued, and the European price apparently was austerity. The protests broke out from Greece to Wall Street. Thomas Picetti’s book on inequality, the capital in the twenty-first century, took the world through the storm, and it appears that Britain is ready to turn-first with Ed Miliband’s criticism of “predatory capital”, then when members of the Labor Party chose to support the Jeremy Corbin attack on a forged economy.
After a decade, the Time arrow may have finally reached its fingerprint. Britain has a partisan government with a huge majority, and after years of jumping from British prime ministers from Etone or Winchester, the country is now leading the son of a tool maker. Even the leader of the Conservative Party, Kimi Badnoush, claims to be “The working class became” Teenage, while doing some shifts in McDonald’s.
The working -class background has become the emblem that politicians are attempting to show off. But what about the separation policy? Well, this is a different issue. The statement, which prompted Sir Kerr Starmer to power last summer, “workers” 21 times, But “inequality” Only once. What does the Prime Minister mean “workers”? It was a question that he fought to answer before the budget last October, which ultimately indicates that the term indicates “those who do not always have the means to write a check.” Books of normal adult Only two checks Throughout the past year.
Today, political leaders treat the class as a issue of culture instead of economy, around tastes and traditions instead of where you sit in terms of power. With a sharp paradox, the class war has become a cultural war.
The work government hopes to make the labor law more progressive, but raising children from the working class, it suggests lessons in Eurasian, or speaking skills. As a member of the rising deputy, Rachel Reeves was attacking David Cameron due to tax discounts for the wealthy; Now she is a consultant, she listens strongly to what she calls “non -Dommy society”. But it was right the first time: Britain is highlighting the amount of wealth that goes to those wealthy already, while the rest of the country has obtained real stagnant wages. A crowd of Davos may lead the headlines of good newspapers, but it does nothing for public financial resources, not to mention the voters.
There is a risk of stripping a group of its connections with inequality, named Nigel Faraj. This is the radical right that raises increasing confidence as defenders of the working class. Regardless of the decline in the actual reform policies, the economy that reaches the main headlines – Times water Or Port Talbot – Mr. Farage and Richard Tice will now ignore the left center. It is the same formula that led Donald Trump to power. A man is richer to be president of the United States telling himself in the elections as a hero for workers with blue collars; Once in power surrounds itself with technical billionaires. Throughout Europe, he studied the radical oath for example. The center left was somewhat slower on absorption, but they must urgently learn the lesson that abandoned the vacuum policy and that class policy could be taken by beginners as well as progressive. The results of this key may be proven disastrous.
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you want to provide a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered to be published in our messages section, please click here.