Another barrier: The proposal to falsify voters, the Republican Party, may make it difficult for married women to vote

Experts say that the Republican proposal is apparently aimed at inhibiting non -employees from voting in the federal elections – which is already an illegal act and rarely happens.

American voter eligibility law, re -submitted Written by Republican Representative Cheeb Roy of Texas, this legislative sessionIt seeks to amend the law of registration of the national voters to clarify that qualified voters are providing documentary evidence of American citizenship to register to vote in the federal elections, a response to unfounded concerns of voting on a large scale. However, voting rights defenders and legal experts are concerned that the draft law also threatens to restrict voting access to women – and millions of other Americans – by making it difficult for them to prove that they are eligible for polling.

Selena Stewart, CEO of the United States Association in the United States, told a salon that the draft law will create “fundamental barriers” for eligible voters who would weigh the low -income Americans and working Americans, who may not be able to withstand the document fees copies or should take Vacation from work to get it.

“While she is in her face, it appears to deal with the security of the elections, this measure creates unnecessary obstacles to voting when there is sufficient guarantees against an non -citizen vote,” Stewart said in a statement. “The timing and scope of these requirements will prevent individuals from voting instead of voting [be] Reforming security in elections is meaningful. ”

the invoiceAnd, which was approved by the House of Representatives, but stopped in the Senate during the last legislative session, is described as an attempt to prevent voters and ensure that citizens participate only in the American elections. Federal Law Not citizens are already prohibited from registration to vote and participate in the federal elections, and research indicates registration and a non -citizen vote very rare. the 1993 Nvra It also requires voters to testify to their eligibility on the request for registration under the penalty of perjury.

The acceptable documents to prove the individual’s nationality under the Conservation Law include a definition that meets 2005 true knowledge lawrequirements ; A valid American passport and a valid image of the government when submitted in addition to an accredited birth certificate; An excerpt from the record of an American hospital from birth; Final adoption decree; Or an Indian American card, among other documents.

The problem with which opponents of the draft law relate to the Americans’ arrival to the establishment of citizenship. While the majority of Americans have documents that prove their nationality easily, the Brennan 2023 Center and the Maryland University Center for Democracy and Civil Participation reconnaissance I found that at least 9 % of American citizens of voting age do not reach about 21.3 million people. This contrast is more clear among Americans with color, 11 % of them lack ready access to citizenship documents compared to only 8 % of white Americans.

For Americans who have documents proving their nationality easily available, the basic document they will reach is their birth certificates. More than 140 million American citizens do not have an American passport, according to American Progressive Report Center.

This is where the preservation law provides an additional obstacle. If a person’s birth certificate does not match his legal name – this is often the case for married women who took the last name of their wife – they may have to provide additional documents for registration to vote under this procedure. Marriage certificates and documents for changing names in the draft law are not listed as acceptable documents to prove citizenship.

PEPAbout 69 million women of the age of voting will face the last name of the wife, the obstacles that vote under the rescue law.

As is currently written, the obstacles created by the draft law can be a marriage inhibitor – or, at least traditional marriage – Marsia Zog, a professor of law at South Carolina University whose research focuses on the Immigration Law, Reproductive Rights, Indian Indian Law and Marital Law.

“If you want to be sarcastic – there are a lot of policies that attack women – the way I was shocked, almost, it was back to it coverageZog said in an interview over the phone, referring to the colonial legal practice that held any of its own legal identity. “Married women do not need to vote, right? They are married. Their husbands will care about their interests. “

“I don’t know that he is thoughtful – this may be unseen,” she added, stressing that it is “related to me.”

In a statement of a salon, the primary invoice sponsor, Representative Chip Roy, R-TEXAS, claims that the Save law will make it difficult for married women to vote. Proposal He pointed to protection in the language of the draft law aimed at addressing contradictions in proving citizenship documents.

This ruling requires that each state create an operation that allows the subcontinent of registration of voters to provide “such additional documents for the appropriate elections for the state that may be necessary to prove that the applicant is a citizen of the United States.”

“This draft law is not attacked because it will exclude citizens from voting – he will not do so. It is being attacked because politics is very popular with the American people, and they want its opponents and need illegitimate voting, and they will use anything they can attack,” Roy said.

But Joanna Grossman, a professor of law law at the Law College at SMU, specializes in women and law, said that even if the legislation includes a mechanism that allows countries to overcome.

“Any administrative burden adds to the vote only reduces the number of people who can vote,” she told Salon in an interview on the phone.

Garrosman said that the additional difficulty in registering in voting is likely to discourage some of the voters who are qualified for the rituals, while a group of others may not be able to obtain successful documents to do so due to procedural obstacles, noting an example. Challenges Texas faced the identity of an identity and re -released before the elections.

“It doesn’t really matter what the official rule is,” Grossman said. “You just add administrative obstacles, in fact, it means that many people who should be qualified to vote cannot vote, and these people will be nearly 100 % of women based on the practices of changing the name.”

Similar requirements were implemented for government and local elections in Arizona and Kandas in 2022 and 2011, respectively, as well threatening Or led to the denial of tens of thousands of legitimate voter records. As a result of its law, about 31,000 Kansans – about 12.4 % of the new voter records between January 1, 2013 and December 11, 2015 – Are their registration requests canceled or suspended Because they were unable to provide the required documents, according to Court documents From the case of the American Court of Appeal for the year 2020, it defies the law.

Stewart said that the process of addressing the contradictions created by the Roy Bill, “ignores the documented failures of these policies at the state level.” She added that the legislation will mainly change how millions of Americans record vote, in practice, to eliminate registration engines via the Internet, mail and registration of voters.

“This is a draft law that does not solve a problem,” said Stewart.

Instead, Congress called for a “immediate action” to support the measures that protect democracy, protect voting rights and ensure fair access to voting without creating barriers like John Lewis’s voting law lawthe Freedom of voting lawand The original American voting rights law.

Stewart said of the rescue law: “Leaving him to the states is not a solution, as we saw in Arizona and Kandas.” “The draft law is another obstacle to voting, and Congress should not be, will not pass, and will not pass it.”