Life Style & Wellness

Christie Nayyv’s strange war on “leaks”: the new Maga Pararanoya borders


On February 8, 2025, Los Angeles Times reported In a “Talabat document” she said that the application of immigration on a large scale came soon to the city of angels as part of President Trump’s mass deportation efforts. More specifically, the enforcement of immigration and customs in the United States (ICE) would lead the process, which leads to the lack of legal status in the United States or who have suspended removal orders, and that FBA and DeA agents have been called to help.

The next day, the Minister of Internal Security (DHS) suggested that the FBI had leaked the raid information.

“The Federal Bureau books On X, it seems that it failed to realize that the FBI He is The agency that achieves leaks.

A month later, Naim published on X that the Ministry of National Security had identified the leaks and that they were not from the FBI, but rather its own agency. Moreover, she said she was preparing to refer her to the Ministry of Justice for judicial prosecution, noting that they “face up to 10 years in the federal prison.” On CBS “The face of the nationSundayand Nim I put more There were two dropouts and that they were “leaking from our enforcement operations that we planned and we managed in several cities.”

I represented a number of alleged “leaks” and this surprised me as a strange reasons.

As a preliminary issue, when the government and law enforcement and/or military operations are the subject of unauthorized disclosure, the government rarely emphasizes the originality of the leakage directly from the gate. Usually the first official response is that the government cannot “confirm and do not deny” even a leakage.

None of this is the practice of proper investigation, no sign of a health agency, a good and good work-especially responsibility for our internal security.

Also, the government is usually not verified by the leakage content – especially the operational details – of the assumed sensitive information. Even if the information is completely classified, the law enforcement (including those that have been aborted) remains closely held. In addition, by checking the leakage and describing it, Noem has mainly broadcast it – this time with loudspeakers with a louder voice and owners of the United States.

Nim states that the employees who are exposed to a player in which he is considered to be other violations. The question arises why employees are undergoing lying exams, which cannot be reliable and unacceptable in court, if the Ministry of National Security has already determined the perpetrators. To the extent that Noem reveals the details of DHS’s internal investigation, this is either dirty or aims to intimidate the workforce that supervises them. It also reveals details of what appears to be a continuous federal criminal investigation. None of this is the practice of proper investigation, no sign of a health agency, a good and good work-especially responsibility for our internal security.

Finally, Naim pointed out that “the leaks are calculated and will be criminally tried”, so do not fail to realize that “leakage” is not a crime unless the poor national defense information has been involved – something that has never been confirmed and will seem opportunistic after her other public statements. When the labels “face up to 10 years in the Federal Prison” it appears, it appears to refer to the 1917 spying law (she criticized the law here), which was used primarily to receive the amounts of violations from Daniel Eliberg to Thomas Drake, John Kiriako, Edward Snowden, realistic realistic.

However, the cases of spying law include alleged press disclosure of the alleged classified information that has been harmed by national security. Naim did not call any of these magical tannals, which hardly break the national security system from imposing in cases of leakage. It is unclear why you plan to use the full force of the entire executive authority to follow up and punish the leakage of the most embarrassing administration, but it (in its own evaluation) caused any actual damage that can be determined.

Nayeem data raises more questions than they answer. The inquiry line may be better to know that Why Employees assigned to protect our homeland will feel the need to leak on ice raids to enhance Trump’s deportation designs. In her pledge to “continue to do everything we can to preserve a safe America”, it may be worth examining who Christie’s sleep truly tries to protect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *