NHS news and lawyers have destroyed the memories of our child, the parents say NHS

Ben at the age of eight years of weeks at the Children’s Intensive Care Unit at Bristol Royal Children’s Hospital in the spring of 2015 was a shock and a rap for Jenny and Eline Condon.

In the ten years that followed, they say that their pain was not hidden, but if there is anything, it has become more severe the way they were treated with health confidence while they were carrying out a campaign to find out the cause of Ben’s death.

“This has been destroyed,” said Jenny, who tried to kill herself and has post -trauma syndrome. “I am a broken woman. I am in constant fighting or a trip.”

Speaking at the end of the two-week investigation, it ended on Friday-who laid naked failures in the care of Ben, often contradictory, complicated, and as his parents see, Allen-their precious memories were transferred by Ben. The confidence approach that runs the hospital.

“Until he went to Bristol, Ben was a good child,” said Allen, a former Olympic athlete. We had good memories of Ben. Over the ten years that followed, they evaporated those good memories, they took every good memory. “

Ben was born prematurely on February 17, 2015. In April, he was difficult to breathe and was transferred to the Children’s Hospital, where doctors diagnosed the HMPV virus (HMPV), a respiratory infection. He quickly refused, and he had two heart attacks on April 17 and died.

It was immediately said that there was no need for post -death because the cause of death was clear. Doctors recorded acute respiratory syndrome (ARDS), HMPV and cheapness on his death certificate and burning his body. But several weeks after the death of Bin Bin was told that he was suffering from a bacterial infection.

In 2016, the first investigation concluded that the respiratory system and his hereness caused Failure to give him antibiotics in time For bacterial infection contributed to his death.

In 2021, the Grievance Secretary at NHS said that Ben died after a “catalog of failures” in his treatment and there was an attempt to “deceive” his parents. The Supreme Court canceled the conclusions of the first investigation and a new investigation was conducted in the Avon Coroner court near Bristol.

On Friday, the Criminal Investigative Judge, who heard the second investigation, Robert Sorsby, supported Condos that the death certificate and the conclusion of the first investigation were incomplete.

He decided that the false bacterial infection, as well as the respiratory system and its cheek, caused his death.

Sorsbi, the assistant investigating judge in Avon, stated that the consultants between 14 and 16 April decided not to give Ben Antibiotics. “I found that Ben should have been antibiotics by April 16 at the latest,” Surrsbe said, adding that if he had antibiotics, he would have stopped Pseudomonas infection that enters into the bloodstream.

The investigator said that some of the paramedics had a “patron” approach “by my father, and that Jenny and Line were not informed of what was going on or why they did not participate in important decisions. He said that it is “difficult” to understand the delay in informing them of the extent of Ben’s illness.

“I made a lot of mistakes. I raised the actions of the various employees who participated in the care of Ben or in subsequent investigations, and contributed to the family’s inability to believe anything they are informed of,” Surbsbi said.

He also criticized how some hospital staff provided evidence of the investigation, saying that they did not do everything in their power to help him evaluate what happened objectively.

He concluded by saying: “I hope that the Bin family can take some small elements in pride in what they have achieved in their battle for the truth.”

“He should have had after death. If this was done correctly, nothing of this will happen,” said Jenny, 43.

The disturbing evidence that appeared during the investigation included the proposal The tissue samples may have been taken from Ben after his death – His parents assume the test – although they were said that the cause of his death was very clear that there was no need for an examination after the death.

Candos will request the authority of human tissue to investigate whether the samples have been taken, and if they think they are, to refer their results to the police.

“You are registering a death certificate,” Jenny said. “You tell us that there is no need for post -death, but you are doing your own investigations after death,” Jenny said.

Allen, 50, said that confidence continued to “muddy water” during the second investigation. He and Jenny were disturbed by the seats of lawyers who represent confidence and medical staff. “It was defense, defense, and defense. It was terrible. They left all NHS.”

Stewart Walker, Managing Director of Hospitals at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston said E.

“We have been highly education and thinking in the ten years since then.”

“For 10 years, this family faced the defense of institutions, the blocking of clinical records, and an annoying shortage of confidence,” said Mary Smith, head of investigations, human rights and deadly neglect in New South Lu, who represented the family in the second investigation.

“The psychological harm caused by the actions of trust is deep – and it can be fully avoided. These parents simply want the truth.”