The judge is granted a preliminary judicial order on Trump Dy’s executive orders
On Friday, a federal judge granted a preliminary order on parts of the Trump administration’s executive orders on diversity, fairness and integration (Dei).
The dyspowering matter is largely prohibited by the sections of President Donald Trump’s orders that seek to end federal support for DEI programs, and prevents the Trump administration from canceling the contracts they believe to enhance diversity, stocks or inclusion.
American boycott judge Adam Abelson in Baltimore, Biden’s candidate, spent that parts of executive orders are likely to violate the constitution and freedom of expression.
“The damage arises from the issuance of a general executive, mysterious, threatened,” Abelson said in a hearing this week.
Federal judge will temporarily stop Trump from the launch of 11 intelligence officers appointed to Dei programs
President Donald Trump signs executive orders at the Oval Office. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
This ruling comes after the Baltimore City Centers, the National Association of Diversity Personnel in Higher Education, the American Association of University Professors and United Restaurant Opportunities – which represent restaurant workers – a lawsuit against the Trump administration on executive orders, describing them as presidential transgression and anti -heat speech.
Lawyers of the prosecutors wrote in the complaint: “Ordinary citizens bear the greatest burden.” “Prosecutors and their members receive federal funds to support teachers, academics, students, workers and societies throughout the country. While federal agencies make arbitrary decisions on whether the grants are linked to stocks,” the plaintiffs are left in a state of forgetfulness. “
They argued that Trump was encroaching on the powers of Congress in order to link his personal beliefs.
“But the president simply does not exercise this power,” they wrote in the complaint. “Contrary to his suggestions otherwise, his strength is not limited.”
Trump scores the great legal victory against the Politzer Prize Council members with the lawsuit to discover
Trump signed an order on his first day in his position as he directs federal agencies to end all grants or “shares” contracts. A follow -up order required federal contractors to believe that they are not promoting Dei.
On Friday, a federal judge granted a preliminary order on parts of the Trump administration’s executive orders on diversity, fairness and integration. (Fox News)
The Trump administration argued in a session on Wednesday that the president was only prohibiting the DEI programs that violate federal civil rights laws.
“What is happening is excessive correction and refer to DEI data,” Lawyer Alychadi Getachio said in a hearing.
A second federal lawsuit was also filed in the US boycott court of Colombia on Wednesday, targeting Trump’s executive orders. The new complaint was submitted by the NAACP and Lambda Legal Legal Defense Fund on behalf of non -profit invitation organizations.
The lawsuit aims at Trump’s executive orders: “ending the radical and wasted DEI programs and prefers”, “defending women from the extremism of the gender ideology and restoring the biological truth of the federal government”, and “ending illegal discrimination and restoring the opportunity to merit.”
President Trump with members of the Council of Ministers at the Oval Office. (Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post via Getty Images)
White House spokesman Harrison Fields said that both invitations represent “nothing more than an extension to resist the left,” adding in a statement to the New York Times that the administration was “ready to confront them in court.”
Click here to get the Fox News app
“The winds can either choose to swim against tide and reject the overwhelming will for people, or they can go to its board and work with President Trump to advance in his famous popular agenda,” said Fields.
Fox News Daniel Wallace and Associated Press contributed to this report.